Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737022›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2020

Impact of the Norwegian National Patient Safety Program on implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and on perioperative safety culture.

Arvid Steinar Haugen, Eirik Søfteland, Nick Sevdalis, Geir Egil Eide, Monica Wammen Nortvedt, Charles Vincent, Stig Harthug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Use of the Hospital Survey of Patient Safety Culture in Norwegian Hospitals: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arvid Steinar HaugenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway arvid.haugen@helse-bergen.no.ORCID 0000-0002-1899-9858
Eirik SøftelandDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Nick SevdalisCenter for Implementation Science, Health Service, and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Geir Egil EideCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Monica Wammen NortvedtCentre for Evidence Based Practice, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Vestland, Norway.
Charles VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, London, Oxfordshire, UK.
Stig HarthugDepartment of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur primary objective was to study the impact of the Norwegian National Patient Safety Campaign and Program on Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) implementation and on safety culture. Secondary objective was associations between SSC fidelity and safety culture. We hypothesised that the programme influenced on SSC use and operating theatre personnel's safety culture perceptions.

settingA longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted in a large Norwegian tertiary teaching hospital.

participantsWe invited 1754 operating theatre personnel to participate in the study, of which 920 responded to the surveys at three time points in 2009, 2010 and 2017. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the results of the patient safety culture measured by the culturally adapted Norwegian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Our previously published results from 2009/2010 were compared with new data collected in 2017. Secondary outcome was correlation between SSC fidelity and safety culture. Fidelity was electronically recorded.

resultsSurvey response rates were 61% (349/575), 51% (292/569) and 46% (279/610) in 2009, 2010 and 2017, respectively. Eight of the 12 safety culture dimensions significantly improved over time with the largest increase being '

conclusionThe National Patient Safety Program, fostering engagement from trust boards, hospital managers and frontline operating theatre personnel enabled effective implementation of the SSC. As part of a wider strategic safety initiative, implementation of SSC coincided with an improved safety culture.

Indexed as

ChecklistCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsNorwayOperating RoomsPatient SafetyTertiary Care CentersWorld Health Organizationanaesthesiahealthcare quality improvementpatient safetysafety culturesurgery

Identifiers

PMID32737022
PMCPMC7394019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.