Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32736965›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2020

Is There a 'Social' Brain? Implementations and Algorithms.

Patricia L Lockwood, Matthew A J Apps, Steve W C Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Prosocial Behavior toward Others in Negative State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  13. Dopamine Boosts Motivation for Prosocial Effort in Parkinson's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Central Questions for Social Neuroscience Research.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural mechanisms underlying decisions to express or suppress emotions.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia L LockwoodDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: patricia.lockwood@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Matthew A J AppsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Steve W C ChangDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Behavioral and Neural Bases of Combining Oxytocin and Naloxone for Optimally Enhancing Interactive Social AttentionR01MH120081 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, STEVE W. C. · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Toward A Macaque Model Of Social Brain Dysfunction In Real-Life Social InteractionsR01MH110750 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, STEVE W. C. · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Medical Research Council MR/P014097/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110750NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120081Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question in psychology and neuroscience is the extent to which cognitive and neural processes are specialised for social behaviour, or are shared with other 'non-social' cognitive, perceptual, and motor faculties. Here we apply the influential framework of Marr (1982) across research in humans, monkeys, and rodents to propose that information processing can be understood as 'social' or 'non-social' at different levels. We argue that processes can be socially specialised at the implementational and/or the algorithmic level, and that changing the goal of social behaviour can also change social specificity. This framework could provide important new insights into the nature of social behaviour across species, facilitate greater integration, and inspire novel theoretical and empirical approaches.

Indexed as

BrainNeurosciencesAlgorithmsCognitionSocial Behaviorbraincellcircuitcognitive processcomputationalhumansprimatesrodentssocial behaviorsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID32736965
PMCPMC7501252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.