Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32736634›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Axes of alienation: applying an intersectional lens on the social contract during the pandemic response to protect sexual and reproductive rights and health.

Jashodhara Dasgupta, Marta Schaaf, Sana Qais Contractor, Amanda Banda, Marisa Viana, Oksana Kashyntseva, Ana Lorena Ruano

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Changes in Access to Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jashodhara DasguptaSAHAYOG, F 25 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Marta SchaafIndependent Consultant, 357 Sixth Ave, Brooklyn, NY, 11215, USA. martaschaafconsult@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-5966
Sana Qais ContractorCOPASAH Sexual and Reproductive Rights Hub, CHSJ, Basement of Young Women's Hostel No 2, Avenue 21, G block, Saket, New Delhi, 110017, India.
Amanda BandaWemos, Amsterdam, Hallmark House, 54 Siemert Road, New Doornfontein, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2094, South Africa.
Marisa VianaRESURJ, RESURJ, C/O The Praxis Project, 1900 Fruitvale Avenue, #3D, Oakland, CA, 94601, USA.
Oksana KashyntsevaCenter for Harmonization of Human Rights of the Scientific Research Institute of IP of National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine, Каzymyra Маlevycha, 11, Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine.
Ana Lorena RuanoCenter for International Health, University of Bergen / Center for the Study of Equity and Governance in Health Systems (CEGSS), Guatemala, Center for International Health, Postboks 7804, NO-5020, Bergen, Norway.
Center for the Study of Equity and Governance in Health Systems · GTPraxis (United States) · USSimulConsult · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While economic inequalities have been a key focus of attention through the COVID 19 pandemic, gendered relations of power at every level have undermined health rights of women, girls and gender diverse individuals. Sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR) have always been sites of power contestations within families, societies, cultures, and politics; these struggles are exacerbated by economic, racial, religious, caste, citizenship status, and other social inequities, especially in times of crisis such as these. Policy responses to the COVID pandemic such as lockdown, quarantine, contact tracing and similar measures are premised on the existence of a social contract between the government and the people and among people, with the health sector playing a key role in preventive and curative care.We propose the use of an intersectional lens to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social contract, drawing on our field experiences from different continents particularly as related to SRHR. Along with documenting the ways in which the pandemic hinders access to services, we note that it is essential to interrogate state-society relations in the context of vulnerable and marginalized groups, in order to understand implications for SRHR. Intersectional analysis takes on greater importance now than in non-pandemic times as the state exercises more police or other powers and deploys myriad ways of 'othering'.We conclude that an intersectional analysis should not limit itself to the cumulative disadvantages and injustices posed by the pandemic for specific social groups, but also examine the historical inequalities, structural drivers, and damaged social contract that underlie state-society relationships. At the same time, the pandemic has questioned the status quo and in doing so it has provided opportunities for disruption; for re-imagining a social contract that reaches across sectors, and builds community resilience and solidarities while upholding human rights and gender justice. This must find place in future organizing and advocacy around SRHR.

Indexed as

PoliticsReproductive RightsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthSocial contract; Intersectionality; Pandemic; SRHR/sexual and reproductive health and rights; Marginalized groups

Identifiers

PMID32736634
PMCPMC7393811
OpenAlexW3046543519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.