Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32736502›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2020

Incidence and Predictors of Subsequent Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study.

MOON Knee Group, Jaron P Sullivan, Laura J Huston, Alexander Zajichek, Emily K Reinke, Jack T Andrish, Robert H Brophy, Warren R Dunn, David C Flanigan, Christopher C Kaeding and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

MOON Knee GroupInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jaron P SullivanInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Laura J HustonInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alexander ZajichekInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Emily K ReinkeInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jack T AndrishInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Robert H BrophyInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Warren R DunnInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
David C FlaniganInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher C KaedingInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Robert G MarxInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew J MatavaInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Eric C McCartyInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Richard D ParkerInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Armando F VidalInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Brian R WolfInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Rick W WrightInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kurt P SpindlerInvestigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Prognosis and Predictors of ACL Reconstruction: A Multicenter Cohort StudyR01AR053684 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SPINDLER, KURT PAUL · 2006 to 2020
$8.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cause of subsequent surgery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction varies, but if risk factors for specific subsequent surgical procedures can be identified, we can better understand which patients are at greatest risk. PURPOSE: To report the incidence and types of subsequent surgery that occurred in a cohort of patients 6 years after their index ACL reconstruction and to identify which variables were associated with the incidence of patients undergoing subsequent surgery after their index ACL reconstruction. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

methodsPatients completed a questionnaire before their index ACL surgery and were followed up at 2 and 6 years. Patients were contacted to determine whether any underwent additional surgery since baseline. Operative reports were obtained, and all surgical procedures were categorized and recorded. Logistic regression models were constructed to predict which patient demographic and surgical variables were associated with the incidence of undergoing subsequent surgery after their index ACL reconstruction.

resultsThe cohort consisted of 3276 patients (56.3% male) with a median age of 23 years. A 6-year follow-up was obtained on 91.5% (2999/3276) with regard to information on the incidence and frequency of subsequent surgery. Overall, 20.4% (612/2999) of the cohort was documented to have undergone at least 1 subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee 6 years after their index ACL reconstruction. The most common subsequent surgical procedures were related to the meniscus (11.9%), revision ACL reconstruction (7.5%), loss of motion (7.8%), and articular cartilage (6.7%). Significant risk factors for incurring subsequent meniscus-related surgery were having a medial meniscal repair at the time of index surgery, reconstruction with a hamstring autograft or allograft, higher baseline Marx activity level, younger age, and cessation of smoking. Significant predictors of undergoing subsequent surgery involving articular cartilage were higher body mass index, higher Marx activity level, reconstruction with a hamstring autograft or allograft, meniscal repair at the time of index surgery, or a grade 3/4 articular cartilage abnormality classified at the time of index ACL reconstruction. Risk factors for incurring subsequent surgery for loss of motion were younger age, female sex, low baseline Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptom subscore, and reconstruction with a soft tissue allograft.

conclusionThese findings can be used to identify patients who are at the greatest risk of incurring subsequent surgery after ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleReoperationRisk FactorsYoung Adultanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionarticular cartilageloss of motionmeniscussubsequent surgery

Identifiers

PMID32736502
PMCPMC8359736
OpenAlexW3046907946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.