Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32736374›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

The relationship between morphological properties and thresholds to extracellular electric stimulation in α RGCs.

Paul Werginz, Vineeth Raghuram, Shelley I Fried

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational modelling of the suppression of optic nerve fibre.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inference of Electrical Stimulation Sensitivity from Recorded Activity of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The effect of axon trajectory on retinal ganglion cell activation with epiretinal stimulation.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul WerginzInstitute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
Vineeth Raghuram
Shelley I Fried
Harvard University · USTufts University · US

Funding

Investigating the Response of CNS Neurons to Electric and Magnetic StimulationR01NS110575 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Micro-coil implants for cortical activationU01NS099700 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2016 to 2018
$2.9M
Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3947NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110575NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRetinal prostheses strive to restore vison to patients that are blind from retinal degeneration by electrically stimulating surviving retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). The quality of elicited percepts remains limited however and it is desirable to develop improved stimulation strategies. Here, we examine how the anatomical and biophysical properties of RGCs influence activation thresholds, including the effects of variations found naturally. APPROACH: Detailed reconstructions were made of a large number of mouse α RGCs and were used to create an array of model cells; the models were used to study the effects of individual anatomical features on activation threshold to electric stimulation. Stimulation was delivered epiretinally from a point-source or disk electrode and consisted of monophasic or biphasic rectangular pulses. MAIN

resultsModeling results show that the region of minimum threshold always is within the axon initial segment (AIS). The properties of this region as well as the absolute value of the minimum threshold are dependent on the length of the AIS as well as on the relative composition of sodium channels within the AIS. Other morphological features, including cell size, dendritic field size and the distance between the AIS and the soma had only a minimal influence on thresholds. Introducing even a small number of low-threshold Na SIGNIFICANCE: Intrinsic morphological features can influence activation thresholds with the AIS having the strongest influence. However, the combined influence remains limited and may not be large enough to allow for selective activation between different RGC types.

Indexed as

Retinal Ganglion CellsVisual ProsthesisAction PotentialsAnimalsAxonsElectric StimulationHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID32736374
PMCPMC8666090
OpenAlexW3046843308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.