Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735871›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2020

Behavioral testing in animal models of spinal cord injury.

K Fouad, C Ng, D M Basso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K FouadUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dept of Physical Therapy, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton T6G 2G4, Canada; University of Alberta, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, 2-132 Li Ka Shing, Edmonton T6G 2E1, Canada. Electronic address: kfouad@ualberta.ca.
C NgUniversity of Alberta, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, 2-132 Li Ka Shing, Edmonton T6G 2E1, Canada.
D M BassoOhio State University, College of Medicine, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 106A Atwell Hall, 453 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Funding

Behavioral and Cellular Determinants of Treadmill Training and Recovery After SCIR01NS074882 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BASSO, D M · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is based on a lecture presented at the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation sponsored Spinal Cord Injury Training Program at Ohio State University. We discuss the advantages and challenges of injury models in rodents and theory relation to various behavioral outcome measures. We offer strategies and advice on experimental design, behavioral testing, and on the challenges, one will encounter with animal testing. This review is designed to guide those entering the field of spinal cord injury and/or involved with in vivo animal testing.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansModels, AnimalRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesBehavioral testingExperimental designForelimbHindlimbLesion modelRodentSpinal cord injuryVariability

Identifiers

PMID32735871
PMCPMC8325780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.