Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735841›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2020

Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study.

Martin Urner, Peter Jüni, Bettina Hansen, Marian S Wettstein, Niall D Ferguson, Eddy Fan

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05761626 completednot on this map

Mechanical Power Normalized to Compliance in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorRamos Mejía HospitalRan2016 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmsMP/Crs assessment < = 0.48 J/min/ml/cmH2O
NCT05902403 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Elevated Mean Airway Pressure Based on a Remote Ventilation Monitoring Platform

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsMechanical Ventilation Pressure High, Intensive Care UnitArmsinvasive mechanical ventilation
NCT07041957 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation Versus Flow-Controlled Ventilation in Burn Patients: A Monocentric, Randomized Controlled, Parallel Group Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Bergmannsheil BochumRan2025 to 2028Enrolled24ConditionsBurn Injury, Inhalational Injury, Pulmonary Complications, Ventilator-induced Lung Injury (VILI)ArmsIndividualized flow-controlled ventilation strategy, Pressure-controlled ventilation strategy via the application of Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin UrnerInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter JüniDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bettina HansenDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marian S WettsteinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Niall D FergusonInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: eddy.fan@uhn.ca.
University of Toronto · CAToronto General Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Mortality in acute respiratory failure remains high despite the use of lung-protective ventilation. Recent studies have shown an association between baseline ventilation parameters (driving pressure or mechanical power) and outcomes for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Strategies focused on limiting these parameters have been proposed to further improve outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether driving pressure and mechanical power should be limited over the entire duration of mechanical ventilation and in all patients with acute respiratory failure. We aimed to estimate the association between exposure to different intensities of mechanical ventilation over time and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure.

methodsIn this registry-based, prospective cohort study, we obtained data from the Toronto Intensive Care Observational Registry, which includes all patients receiving mechanical ventilation for 4 h or more in nine ICUs that are affiliated with the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON, Canada). We included all adult (≥18 years) patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation between April 11, 2014, and June 5, 2019. Patients were excluded if they received treatment with extracorporeal life support. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Bayesian joint models were used to estimate the strength of associations, accounting for informative censoring due to death during follow-up.

findingsOf 13 939 patients recorded in the registry, 13 408 (96·2%) were eligible for descriptive analysis. The primary analysis comprised 7876 (58·7%) patients with complete baseline characteristics, and a secondary analysis included all 13 408 patients after multiple imputation in the joint model analysis. 2409 (18·0%) of 13 408 patients died in the ICU. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, including age and severity of illness, a significant increase in the hazard of death was found to be associated with each daily increment in driving pressure (hazard ratio 1·064, 95% credible interval 1·057-1·071) or mechanical power (hazard ratio 1·060, 95% credible interval 1·053-1·066). These associations persisted over the duration of mechanical ventilation.

interpretationCumulative exposure to higher intensities of mechanical ventilation was harmful, even for short durations. Limiting exposure to driving pressure or mechanical power should be evaluated in further studies as promising ventilation strategies to reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure.

fundingCanadian Institutes of Health Research.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary Gas ExchangeRegistriesRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32735841
PMCPMC7906666
OpenAlexW3046103534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.