Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Mapping language function with task-based vs. resting-state functional MRI.

Ki Yun Park, John J Lee, Donna Dierker, Laura M Marple, Carl D Hacker, Jarod L Roland, Daniel S Marcus, Mikhail Milchenko, Michelle M Miller-Thomas, Tammie L Benzinger and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The role of spatial processing in verbal serial order working memory.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The promise of precision functional mapping for neuroimaging in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluating the concordance of functional MRI-based language lateralization and Wada testing in epilepsy patients: A single-center analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ki Yun ParkMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-9421
John J LeeMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2269-6267
Donna DierkerMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Laura M MarpleMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Carl D HackerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jarod L RolandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Daniel S MarcusMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Mikhail MilchenkoMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Michelle M Miller-ThomasMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1329-4031
Tammie L BenzingerMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Joshua S ShimonyMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-776X
Abraham Z SnyderMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Eric C LeuthardtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WUIDDRC Supplement-Supporting the health and well-being of children with intellectual and developmental disability during COVID-19 pandemicP50HD103525 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY D MILBRANDT · 2020 to 2026
$15.5M
Augmented Neurosurgical Navigation Software Using Resting State MRIR01CA203861 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Eric CLAUDE Leuthardt, JOSHUA S SHIMONY · 2017 to 2026
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203861NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of functional MRI (fMRI) in pre-surgical planning is a non-invasive method for pre-operative functional mapping for patients with brain tumors, especially tumors located near eloquent cortex. Currently, this practice predominantly involves task-based fMRI (T-fMRI). Resting state fMRI (RS-fMRI) offers an alternative with several methodological advantages. Here, we compare group-level analyses of RS-fMRI vs. T-fMRI as methods for language localization. PURPOSE: To contrast RS-fMRI vs. T-fMRI as techniques for localization of language function.

methodsWe analyzed data obtained in 35 patients who had both T-fMRI and RS-fMRI scans during the course of pre-surgical evaluation. The RS-fMRI data were analyzed using a previously trained resting-state network classifier. The T-fMRI data were analyzed using conventional techniques. Group-level results obtained by both methods were evaluated in terms of two outcome measures: (1) inter-subject variability of response magnitude and (2) sensitivity/specificity analysis of response topography, taking as ground truth previously reported maps of the language system based on intraoperative cortical mapping as well as meta-analytic maps of language task fMRI responses.

resultsBoth fMRI methods localized major components of the language system (areas of Broca and Wernicke) although not with equal inter-subject consistency. Word-stem completion T-fMRI strongly activated Broca's area but also several task-general areas not specific to language. RS-fMRI provided a more specific representation of the language system.

conclusionWe demonstrate several advantages of classifier-based mapping of language representation in the brain. Language T-fMRI activated task-general (i.e., not language-specific) functional systems in addition to areas of Broca and Wernicke. In contrast, classifier-based analysis of RS-fMRI data generated maps confined to language-specific regions of the brain.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAttentionBrainBrain MappingBroca AreaFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityGlioblastomaHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedRest

Identifiers

PMID32735611
PMCPMC7394427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.