Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735604›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Machine learning approach to predict postoperative opioid requirements in ambulatory surgery patients.

Akira A Nair, Mihir A Velagapudi, Jonathan A Lang, Lakshmana Behara, Ravitheja Venigandla, Nishant Velagapudi, Christine T Fong, Mayumi Horibe, John D Lang, Bala G Nair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain: Time for increased rigor.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Akira A NairLakeside High School, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Mihir A VelagapudiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Jonathan A LangHaverford College, Haverford, PA, United States of America.
Lakshmana BeharaPerimatics LLC, Bellevue, WA, United States of America.
Ravitheja VenigandlaPerimatics LLC, Bellevue, WA, United States of America.
Nishant VelagapudiPerimatics LLC, Bellevue, WA, United States of America.
Christine T FongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Mayumi HoribeDepartment of Anesthesiology, VA Puget Sound Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
John D LangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-565X
Bala G NairDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-3979
Bellevue Hospital Center · USHaverford College · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

The Pediatric Injury and Violence Prevention Student Internship Training Program (INSIGHT)R25HD094336 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kushang Patel · 2018 to 2026
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD094336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioids play a critical role in acute postoperative pain management. Our objective was to develop machine learning models to predict postoperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. To develop the models, we used a perioperative dataset of 13,700 patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing ambulatory surgery between the years 2016-2018. The data, comprising of patient, procedure and provider factors that could influence postoperative pain and opioid requirements, was randomly split into training (80%) and validation (20%) datasets. Machine learning models of different classes were developed to predict categorized levels of postoperative opioid requirements using the training dataset and then evaluated on the validation dataset. Prediction accuracy was used to differentiate model performances. The five types of models that were developed returned the following accuracies at two different stages of surgery: 1) Prior to surgery-Multinomial Logistic Regression: 71%, Naïve Bayes: 67%, Neural Network: 30%, Random Forest: 72%, Extreme Gradient Boost: 71% and 2) End of surgery-Multinomial Logistic Regression: 71%, Naïve Bayes: 63%, Neural Network: 32%, Random Forest: 72%, Extreme Gradient Boost: 70%. Analyzing the sensitivities of the best performing Random Forest model showed that the lower opioid requirements are predicted with better accuracy (89%) as compared with higher opioid requirements (43%). Feature importance (% relative importance) of model predictions showed that the type of procedure (15.4%), medical history (12.9%) and procedure duration (12.0%) were the top three features contributing to model predictions. Overall, the contribution of patient and procedure features towards model predictions were 65% and 35% respectively. Machine learning models could be used to predict postoperative opioid requirements in ambulatory surgery patients and could potentially assist in better management of their postoperative acute pain.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresMachine LearningAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPain ManagementPostoperative PainAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32735604
PMCPMC7394436
OpenAlexW3046238896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.