Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735601›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Distortion correction of diffusion weighted MRI without reverse phase-encoding scans or field-maps.

Kurt G Schilling, Justin Blaber, Colin Hansen, Leon Cai, Baxter Rogers, Adam W Anderson, Seth Smith, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Tonia Rex, Susan M Resnick and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reduced Effect ofNeurology. Genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Image Distortion Correction for Diffusion MR Imaging Using a Transformer-based U-Net.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kurt G SchillingRadiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3686-7645
Justin BlaberElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Colin HansenComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Leon CaiBiomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Baxter RogersRadiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-2797
Adam W AndersonRadiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Seth SmithRadiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Praitayini KanakarajElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Tonia RexVanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Susan M ResnickLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Andrea T ShaferLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4599-5980
Laurie E CuttingSpecial Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Neil WoodwardPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
David ZaldNeuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Bennett A LandmanRadiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Vanderbilt University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF HUNTINGTON'S DISEASER01NS040068 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PAULSEN, JANE S · 2001 to 2013
$48.5M
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
VALIDITY OF SUBTYPES OF ADHDP50HD027802 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ERIK G WILLCUTT · 1990 to 2026
$44.9M
Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
Neuroimaging Predictors of Cognitive Decline, Impairment, and ResilienceZIAAG000191 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI FERRUCCI, LUIGI · 2009 to 2025
$26.4M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Cognitive and functional brain changes in preclinical Huntington's disease (HD)R01NS054893 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PAULSEN, JANE S · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
BRAINS Morphology and Image AnalysisR01NS050568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAGNOTTA, VINCENT A · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
Translational Developmental Neuroscience of AutismK23MH087770 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DI MARTINO, ADRIANA · 2010 to 2013
$644k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD027802NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087770NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH096321NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040068NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050568NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance images may suffer from geometric distortions due to susceptibility induced off resonance fields, which cause geometric mismatch with anatomical images and ultimately affect subsequent quantification of microstructural or connectivity indices. State-of-the art diffusion distortion correction methods typically require data acquired with reverse phase encoding directions, resulting in varying magnitudes and orientations of distortion, which allow estimation of an undistorted volume. Alternatively, additional field maps acquisitions can be used along with sequence information to determine warping fields. However, not all imaging protocols include these additional scans and cannot take advantage of state-of-the art distortion correction. To avoid additional acquisitions, structural MRI (undistorted scans) can be used as registration targets for intensity driven correction. In this study, we aim to (1) enable susceptibility distortion correction with historical and/or limited diffusion datasets that do not include specific sequences for distortion correction and (2) avoid the computationally intensive registration procedure typically required for distortion correction using structural scans. To achieve these aims, we use deep learning (3D U-nets) to synthesize an undistorted b0 image that matches geometry of structural T1w images and intensity contrasts from diffusion images. Importantly, the training dataset is heterogenous, consisting of varying acquisitions of both structural and diffusion. We apply our approach to a withheld test set and show that distortions are successfully corrected after processing. We quantitatively evaluate the proposed distortion correction and intensity-based registration against state-of-the-art distortion correction (FSL topup). The results illustrate that the proposed pipeline results in b0 images that are geometrically similar to non-distorted structural images, and more closely match state-of-the-art correction with additional acquisitions. In addition, we show generalizability of the proposed approach to datasets that were not in the original training / validation / testing datasets. These datasets included varying populations, contrasts, resolutions, and magnitudes and orientations of distortion and show efficacious distortion correction. The method is available as a Singularity container, source code, and an executable trained model to facilitate evaluation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID32735601
PMCPMC7394453
OpenAlexW2999182567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.