Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Eliciting preferences for outpatient care experiences in Hungary: A discrete choice experiment with a national representative sample.

Óscar Brito Fernandes, Márta Péntek, Dionne Kringos, Niek Klazinga, László Gulácsi, Petra Baji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Population norms for the EQ-5D-5L for Hungary: comparison of online surveys and computer assisted personal interviews.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Óscar Brito FernandesDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3212-373X
Márta PéntekDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Dionne KringosDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niek KlazingaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
László GulácsiDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Petra BajiDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are central to inform on the responsiveness of health systems to citizens' health care needs and expectations. At their current form, PREMs do not reflect the weights that patients assign to varying aspects of the care experience. We aimed to investigate patients' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for attributes of the care experience in outpatient settings.

methodsA discrete choice experiment was conducted among a representative sample of the general adult population of Hungary (n = 1000). Choice set attributes and levels were defined based on OECD's standardized PREMs (e.g. a doctor spending enough time in consultation, providing easy to understand explanations, giving opportunity to ask questions, and involving in decision making) and a price attribute. Conditional and mixed logit analyses were conducted. WTP estimates were computed in preference and WTP space.

resultsThe respondents most preferred attribute was that of a doctor spending enough time in consultation, followed by involvement in decision making. Moreover, waiting times had a less important effect on respondents' choice preference compared with aspects of the doctor-patient relationship. Estimates in the WTP space varied from €4.38 (2.85-5.90) for waiting an hour less at a doctor's office to €36.13 (32.07-40.18) for a consultation where a doctor spends enough time with a patient relative to a consultation where a doctor does not.

conclusionsA preference-based PREMs approach provide insight on the value patients assign to different aspects of their care experience. This can inform the decisions of policy-makers and other stakeholders to coordinate efforts and resource allocation in a more targeted manner, by acting on attributes of the care experience that have a greater impact on the implementation of patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareDecision Making, SharedFemaleHealth PolicyHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient PreferenceResource Allocation

Identifiers

PMID32735588
PMCPMC7394384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.