Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32735489›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Choosing Wisely Africa: Ten Low-Value or Harmful Practices That Should Be Avoided in Cancer Care.

Fidel Rubagumya, Gunita Mitera, Sidy Ka, Achille Manirakiza, Philippa Decuir, Susan C Msadabwe, Solange Adani Ifè, Emmanuella Nwachukwu, Naomi Ohene Oti, Hirondina Borges and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Choosing Wisely recommendations in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An analysis of survivorship care strategies in national cancer control plans in Africa.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fidel RubagumyaRwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Gunita MiteraUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sidy KaJoliot Curie Cancer Institute, Dakar, Senegal.
Achille ManirakizaRwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Philippa DecuirBreast Cancer Initiative East Africa, Kigali, Rwanda.
Susan C MsadabweCancer Diseases Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Solange Adani IfèSylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo.
Emmanuella NwachukwuNational Hospital Abuja, Nigeria.
Naomi Ohene OtiKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Hirondina BorgesHospital Agostinho Neto, Praia, Cabo Verde.
Miriam MutebiAga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dafalla AbuidrisNational Cancer Institute, University of Geriza, Wad Madani, Sudan.
Verna VanderpuyeKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Christopher M BoothKingston Health Science Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Nazik HammadKingston Health Science Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChoosing Wisely Africa (CWA) builds on Choosing Wisely (CW) in the United States, Canada, and India and aims to identify low-value, unnecessary, or harmful cancer practices that are frequently used on the African continent. The aim of this work was to use physicians and patient advocates to identify a short list of low-value practices that are frequently used in African low- and middle-income countries.

methodsThe CWA Task Force was convened by the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer and included representatives from surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, the private and public sectors, and patient advocacy groups. Consensus was built through a modified Delphi process, shortening a long list of practices to a short list, and then to a final list. A voting threshold of ≥ 60% was used to include an individual practice on the short list. A consensus was reached after a series of teleconferences and voting processes.

resultsOf the 10 practices on the final list, one is a new suggestion and 9 are revisions or adaptations of practices from previous CW campaign lists. One item relates to palliative care, 8 concern treatment, and one relates to surveillance.

conclusionThe CWA initiative has identified 10 low-value, common interventions in Africa's cancer practice. The success of this campaign will be measured by how the recommendations are implemented across sub-Saharan Africa and whether this improves the delivery of high-quality cancer care.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesNeoplasmsAfricaCanadaConsensusHumansIndiaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32735489
PMCPMC7392774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.