ArticleJournal of learning disabilities2021
Open Science in Education Sciences.
Article in Journal of learning disabilities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open science: My insights into data sharing, preregistration, and replication.Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale · 2025Article
- Open Science practices in a Portuguese nursing higher education institution: An exploratory, descriptive study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Open science practices among early-career human-computer interaction researchers in the US.PloS one · 2025Article
- Education researchers' beliefs and barriers towards data sharing.Quality & quantity · 2025Article
- A data science roadmap for open science organizations engaged in early-stage drug discovery.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Iranian researchers' perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Measuring CHAOS? Evaluating the short-form Confusion, Hubbub And Order Scale.Collabra. Psychology · 2023Article
- Patterns in reporting and participant inclusion related to race and ethnicity in autism intervention literature: Data from a large-scale systematic review of evidence-based practices.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022Article
- A How-To Guide for Open-Science Practices in Special Education Research.Remedial and special education : RASE · 2022Article
- Open Accessibility in Education Research: Enhancing the Credibility, Equity, Impact, and Efficiency of Research.Educational psychologist · 2021Article
- Open Developmental Science: An Overview and Annotated Reading List.Infant and child developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Open Science movement has gained considerable traction in the last decade. The Open Science movement tries to increase trust in research results and open the access to all elements of a research project to the public. Central to these goals, Open Science has promoted five critical tenets: Open Data, Open Analysis, Open Materials, Preregistration, and Open Access. All Open Science elements can be thought of as extensions to the traditional way of achieving openness in science, which has been scientific publication of research outcomes in journals or books. Open Science in education sciences, however, has the potential to be much more than a safeguard against questionable research. Open Science in education science provides opportunities to (a) increase the transparency and therefore replicability of research and (b) develop and answer research questions about individuals with learning disabilities and learning difficulties that were previously impossible to answer due to complexities in data analysis methods. We will provide overviews of the main tenets of Open Science (i.e., Open Data, Open Analysis, Open Materials, Preregistration, and Open Access), show how they are in line with grant funding agencies' expectations for rigorous research processes, and present resources on best practices for each of the tenets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.