ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2020
Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels.
Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for systemic diseases and localized injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Smart Bioinks for 4D Bioprinting: Requirements, Design, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Printing to Fight Antimicrobial Resistance Through Nano/Microstructured Platforms.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Bioinspired 3D Printing of Lignocellulose-Based Multimaterial Composites for Extracellular Matrix-Mimicking Architectures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds: Integrating Conductive Nanomaterials for Smart Wound Healing Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In Situ Characterisation of Hydrogels via Dynamic Interface Printing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Innovative advances and future perspectives in injectable hydrogels for wound healing: a comprehensive review.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles combined with injectable hydrogels in bone defect repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- The Promise of 3D Biomaterial Bioprinting for Wound-Healing and Skin Tissue Restoration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modeling of Biomechanical and Functional Parameters of Hydrogel-Cell Composites Fabricated by 3D Bioprinting Using AI-Supported Approach.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Control of immunogenic responses of microorganism-synthesized biopolymers for 3D bioprinting tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- PVA:ALG Hybrid Bioink for Biofabrication of 3D Neural Models.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Enzyme-Integrated Hydrogels for Advanced Biological Applications.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Review
- 3D biofabricated in vitro models as new approach methodologies for animal alternatives.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Approaching Scarless Wound Healing: From Passive Anti-Fibrotic to Proactive and Programmable Pro-Regenerative Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Beyond graphene: the MXene era in bioprinting.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has recently advanced as an important tool to produce viable constructs that can be used for regenerative purposes or as tissue models. To develop biomimetic and sustainable 3D constructs, several important processing aspects need to be considered, among which crosslinking is most important for achieving desirable biomechanical stability of printed structures, which is reflected in subsequent behavior and use of these constructs. In this work, crosslinking methods used in 3D bioprinting studies are reviewed, parameters that affect bioink chemistry are discussed, and the potential toward improving crosslinking outcomes and construct performance is highlighted. Furthermore, current challenges and future prospects are discussed. Due to the direct connection between crosslinking methods and properties of 3D bioprinted structures, this Review can provide a basis for developing necessary modifications to the design and manufacturing process of advanced tissue-like constructs in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.