Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734563›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021

A Simple, Centrifugation-Free, Sperm-Sorting Device Eliminates the Risks of Centrifugation in the Swim-Up Method While Maintaining Functional Competence and DNA Integrity of Selected Spermatozoa.

Huidrom Yaiphaba Meitei, Shubhashree Uppangala, Krishna Sharan, Srinidhi Gururajarao Chandraguthi, Arunkumar Radhakrishnan, Guruprasad Kalthur, Stefan Schlatt, Satish Kumar Adiga

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Huidrom Yaiphaba MeiteiDepartment of Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Shubhashree UppangalaDepartment of Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Krishna SharanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Srinidhi Gururajarao ChandraguthiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Arunkumar RadhakrishnanSAR Healthline Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, 600010, India.
Guruprasad KalthurDepartment of Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Stefan SchlattCentre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 11, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Satish Kumar AdigaDepartment of Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. satish.adiga@manipal.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2897-4697
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INLifeline Hospital · INUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot study was conducted to explore the benefits of using a centrifugation-free device based on the migration-sedimentation (MS) technique over centrifugation-based techniques in selecting competent spermatozoa, as compared with using split human semen samples. Ejaculates from 35 men undergoing semen analysis were split into four parts where one part was retained as the neat (NE) and the other three parts were subjected to sperm selection by using migration-sedimentation (MS), density gradient (DG) separation, and swim-up (SU) techniques. Sperm functional characteristics along with mitochondrial integrity, tyrosine phosphorylation, acrosome reaction, and ultrastructure were measured. The ability of selection techniques in reducing spontaneous and radiation-induced sperm DNA lesions was assessed by the TUNEL assay. In results, MS-selected spermatozoa had higher viability (P < 0.001), longevity in terms of total motility at the end of 6 and 18 h post-extraction (P < 0.001), and mitochondrial integrity (P < 0.001) compared with those selected by DG. Furthermore, spontaneous DNA lesions were significantly reduced in MS and SU fractions compared with NE (P < 0.001). Similarly, radiation-induced sperm DNA lesions were significantly lower in MS and SU fractions (P < 0.001) compared with DG. Ultrastructural analysis using scanning electron microscopy suggested a moderate, non-significant increase in the number of spermatozoa with normal head and mid-piece in MS fraction compared with other methods. In conclusion, the MS-based device offers a centrifugation-free, efficient, and reliable sperm selection method, making it suitable for partially equipped intra-uterine insemination (IUI) laboratories or office IUI programmes. Further research should focus on the safety and clinical usefulness of the device in assisted conception programmes in general and IUI in specific.

Indexed as

DNA DamageSperm MotilityAdultCell SeparationEjaculationEquipment DesignHumansInfertility, MaleMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPilot ProjectsSpecimen HandlingSpermatozoaDNA damageMIGLISMigration–sedimentationSperm functionSperm preparationSwim-up

Identifiers

PMID32734563
PMCPMC7782414
OpenAlexW3046682791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.