ReviewEndocrine2020
First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and pregnancy: lesson from women with acromegaly.
Review in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFew data are available on the risks of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) during pregnancy in women treated for acromegaly. Current recommendations suggest the withdrawal of treatment at diagnosis of pregnancy. The aims of this literature review were to evaluate the teratogenic effects and the potential impact of SRLs on maternal and fetal outcomes by comparing acromegalic patients treated or not during pregnancy. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study concerns 141 pregnancies in 127 women with acromegaly: 67 pregnancies in 62 women treated with SRLs during pregnancy and 74 pregnancies in 65 women not medically treated during pregnancy. A second analysis was then realized comparing women treated during 1st trimester only (36 pregnancies) and women treated longer (20 pregnancies).
resultsOne malformation (ureteral stenosis) was reported in a newborn of a woman treated with SRL during pregnancy. No difference was found concerning maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes, hypertension, headaches, and delivery mode) and fetal outcomes (birth term, height, and weight). These results were also confirmed for the second analysis.
conclusionsThis review of the literature did report one malformation without being able to prove a specific link with the first-generation SRL treatment. No significant impact on maternal and fetal outcomes is related to first-generation SRL treatment in women with acromegaly. The number of pregnancies is still low and more data are necessary to conclude on the total safety of this treatment during gestation. In the meantime, based on the nonthreatening data from this review of literature, SRL treatment can be continued and/or reintroduced during pregnancy if necessary (mainly for persistent headaches) in women with acromegaly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.