Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734516›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2020

We Can Do Better: Why Pastoral Care Visitation to Hospitals is Essential, Especially in Times of Crisis.

Daniel E Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel E HallCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. hallde@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-0522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From his perspective as a general surgeon, Episcopal priest and Medical Director for High Risk Populations and Outcomes at a large health-care system, the author identifies an unrecognized problem that clergy were banned from visiting parishioners in most hospitals across the country during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic-a situation that persists in many contexts. The author explains why pastoral visitation should be considered essential care-especially at a time of crisis-and encourages hospital administrators across the country to clarify policies to welcome community clergy as essential personnel, but to do so with prudent procedures that mitigate risk to the community and to the visiting clergy. Given the fact that most hospitals in this country were founded by religious organizations and still carry the imprint of that founding in their names, it would be tragic for these very same hospitals to cut patients off from their religious communities precisely at the time they need them most.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPastoral CarePneumonia, ViralClergyCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Covid-19Hospital administrationPastoral carePastoral visitationQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32734516
PMCPMC7392121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.