ReviewClinical rheumatology2021
Multiple coronary aneurysms and acute myocardial infarction in a female patient with rhupus: case report and literature review.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac involvement in autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Aneurysms in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: a case-based review.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) are an infrequent cause of coronary artery disease in both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), most occurring as a result of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Until now, no cases of CAA have been described in a patient with rhupus syndrome (RhS). Differentiating whether CAA stem from primary vasculitis, atherosclerosis, or a combination of both continues to pose a significant challenge. We present the first described clinical case of a 43-year-old patient with RhS and multiple CAA identified by the presentation of an acute myocardial infarction. The presence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors and the absence of inflammatory findings, both in PET-CT and arterial biopsy, favored an atherosclerotic versus a vasculitic etiology of the CAA. At the time of the aneurysms diagnosis, the patient showed no signs of SLE activity and only moderate RA activity, which underscores the importance of screening for silent coronary aneurysms in these patients, even in subjects exhibiting little apparent activity from their underlying disease. This case also exemplifies the severe impact of atherosclerotic burdens on such patients, demanding vigilance and aggressiveness in its prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment. We hypothesize that RhS could engender an even greater risk of presenting CAA than either SLE or RA on their own, which therefore warrants more careful follow-up in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.