Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734378›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2020

Cathodal Cerebellar tDCS Combined with Visual Feedback Improves Balance Control.

Mehran Emadi Andani, Bernardo Villa-Sánchez, Federico Raneri, Silvia Dametto, Michele Tinazzi, Mirta Fiorio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehran Emadi AndaniDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Casorati, 43, 37131, Verona, Italy.
Bernardo Villa-SánchezDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Casorati, 43, 37131, Verona, Italy.
Federico RaneriDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Casorati, 43, 37131, Verona, Italy.
Silvia DamettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Casorati, 43, 37131, Verona, Italy.
Michele TinazziDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Casorati, 43, 37131, Verona, Italy.
Mirta FiorioDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Casorati, 43, 37131, Verona, Italy. mirta.fiorio@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6356-0211
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balance control is essential to maintain a stable body position and to prevent falls. The aim of this study was to determine whether balance control could be improved by using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and visual feedback in a combined approach. A total of 90 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to six groups defined by the delivery of tDCS (cathodal or anodal or sham) and the provision or not of visual feedback on balance during the acquisition phase. tDCS was delivered over the cerebellar hemisphere ipsilateral to the dominant leg for 20 min at 2 mA during a unipedal stance task. Body sway (i.e., ankle angle and hip position) was measured as an overall maximal unit in anteroposterior and mediolateral direction, together with participant rating of perception of stability, before (baseline), during (acquisition), and after (final) the intervention. We found a reduction in body sway during the acquisition session when visual feedback alone was provided. When the visual feedback was removed (final session), however, body sway increased above baseline. Differently, the reduction in overall maximal body sway was maintained during the final session when the delivery of cathodal tDCS and visual feedback was combined. These findings suggest that cathodal tDCS may support the short-term maintenance of the positive effects of visual feedback on balance and provide the basis for a new approach to optimize balance control, with potential translational implications for the elderly and patients with impaired posture control.

Indexed as

AdultCerebellumElectrodesFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMalePostural BalancePsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung AdultBalance controlCerebellumPosturetDCSUnipedal stance taskVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID32734378
PMCPMC7588368
OpenAlexW3046862828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.