Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734363›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2020

Community-Led Monitoring: When Community Data Drives Implementation Strategies.

Solange Baptiste, Alain Manouan, Pedro Garcia, Helen Etya'ale, Tracy Swan, Wame Jallow

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Accelerating Community Engagement: Measuring Results.International journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Solange BaptisteInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Alain ManouanInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Pedro GarciaInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Helen Etya'aleInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition, Johannesburg, South Africa. hetyaale@itpcglobal.org.
Tracy SwanInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Wame JallowInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Right to Care · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCommunities occupy a central position in effective health systems, notably through monitoring of health service quality and by giving recipients of care a voice. Our review identifies community-led monitoring mechanisms and best practices. RECENT

findingsImplementation of community-led monitoring mechanisms improved service delivery at facility-level, health system-wide infrastructure and health outcomes among recipients of care. Successful models were community-led, collaborative, continuous and systematic, and incorporated advocacy and community education. Identifying and replicating successful community-led monitoring practices is a key pathway to equitable access to HIV and health services overall.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareEpidemiological MonitoringGovernment ProgramsHIV InfectionsHumansCommunity dataCommunity-led monitoringHIVImproving health service deliverySocial accountability

Identifiers

PMID32734363
PMCPMC7497354
OpenAlexW3046423059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.