Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734349›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Latest Developments and New Frontiers.

Cathevine Yang, Mesfer Alfadhel, Jacqueline Saw

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women: A Literature Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Resistance exercise for cardiac rehabilitation.Progress in cardiovascular diseases
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cathevine YangUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 2775 Laurel Street Level 11, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
Mesfer AlfadhelInterventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Hospital. 2775 Laurel Street, Level 9, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
Jacqueline SawInterventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Hospital. 2775 Laurel Street, Level 9, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada. jsaw@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-984X
University of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized entity leading to myocardial infarction especially in women. Multiple observational studies have been published in the recent years. This review summarizes the current body of knowledge and recent developments in SCAD epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and management. RECENT

findingsContemporary series have estimated the incidence of SCAD to be up to ~ 4% of all patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Fibromuscular dysplasia, hormonal therapy, multiparity, connective tissue disorders, and systemic inflammatory diseases have been identified as predisposing factors for SCAD. Although SCAD typically presents as ACS, emerging evidence shows that cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest are not uncommon, with higher incidence of complication among peripartum women. Advances in SCAD diagnosis include a novel angiographic classification of SCAD and the use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound to aid in diagnosis. Management depends on clinical stability and the presence of high-risk features. Beta-blockers are the mainstay of medical therapy long term and was shown to reduce recurrent SCAD. The largest study to date including 750 patients across 22 North American centers showed that the majority of patients was managed conservatively and that the technical success rates of percutaneous coronary intervention were low. Following discharge, SCAD-specific cardiac rehabilitation had been shown to have long-term cardiovascular benefits. The recent years have seen a surge in SCAD awareness and publication. Centralized patient networks as well as core lab interpretation of diagnostic data have contributed significantly to the growing body of knowledge. Current efforts to delineate the pathogenesis of SCAD; improve medical and revascularization therapy; and understand complications such as cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest will serve as foundational building blocks for future research and innovation.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCoronary AngiographyCoronary Vessel AnomaliesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography, InterventionalVascular DiseasesACSFibromuscular DysplasiaSCAD

Identifiers

PMID32734349
OpenAlexW3046825206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.