Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734345›Full record

Observational studyPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2020

Is Shigatoxin 1 protective for the development of Shigatoxin 2-related hemolytic uremic syndrome in children? Data from the ItalKid-HUS Network.

Gianluigi Ardissino, Ilaria Possenti, Chiara Vignati, Laura Daprai, Valentina Capone, Maurizio Brigotti, Mario Vittorio Luini, Dario Consonni, Giovanni Montini

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Vacation in Egypt associated with Shiga toxin-producingEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Thrombotic microangiopathy in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gianluigi ArdissinoCenter for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy. ardissino@centroseu.org.
Ilaria PossentiPediatric Unit, Ospedale Infantile C.Arrigo, Spalto Marengo 46, 15121, Alessandria, Italy.
Chiara VignatiUnit of Microbiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Laura DapraiUnit of Microbiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Valentina CaponeCenter for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio BrigottiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Mario Vittorio LuiniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Dario ConsonniEpidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via San Barnaba 8, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni MontiniCenter for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Commenda 9, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShigatoxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are the most common causes of hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS). The aim of our study is to compare the risk of developing STEC-HUS in relation to the type of Stx genes (Stx1, Stx2, or both).

methodsThis is a prospective, observational, multicenter study involving 63 pediatric units in Northern Italy (ItalKid-HUS Network). STEC-infected children were identified within a screening program for bloody diarrhea during a 10-year period (2010-2019). Stx genes were detected by reverse dot blot or real-time PCR. After the identification of STEC infection, children were followed until diarrhea complete recovery for the possible development of STEC-HUS.

resultsOf the 214 Stx-positive patients, 34 (15.9%) developed STEC-HUS. The risk of HUS in STEC-infected children with Stx1 (n: 62; 29.0%) and Stx2 (n: 97; 45.3%) was respectively 0% and 23.7%, while in patients carrying both Stx1 and Stx2 (n: 55; 25.7%), the risk was 12.7% (p: 0.001).

conclusionsOur data confirm that Stx1 is a very rare cause of STEC-HUS and demonstrate that the risk of STEC-HUS halves in the case of Stx1+2-producing Escherichia coli infection compared with infections where Stx2 is present alone. This observation is helpful in assessing the risk of individual STEC-infected patients for the development of HUS and suggests that Stx1, in the presence of Stx2, might exert a protective role possibly by receptor competition.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansInfantMolecular TypingProspective StudiesProtective FactorsRisk AssessmentShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2Shiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2ChildrenDiarrheaHemolytic uremic syndromeShiga toxin

Identifiers

PMID32734345
OpenAlexW3046868155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.