ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021
Morphometric analysis of all 24 hip muscles: A cadaveric study of 18 hip specimens with proposal of a new classification of muscles.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new classification system of superior and inferior gemelli muscles: a cadaveric study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Third-Generation Dynamic Anterior Plate-Screw System for Quadrilateral Fractures: Digital Design Based on 834 Pelvic Measurements.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere are few papers investigating the morphometry of hip muscles and reporting either a single muscle or a group of synergistic muscles. With the development of hip joint simulation, hip arthroplasty implants, and gait analysis, a set of biometric data covering all the muscles that act on the hip joint is needed.
methodsUsing a rigorous dissection process on 18 cadaveric hips, measurements of all 24 hip muscles and bone parameters were conducted. We measured the following: (a) total femur, femoral shaft, and neck lengths, (b) total muscle lengths, (c) intra-muscular and extra-muscular (free) tendon lengths, (d) bone angles, (e) muscle pennation, sagittal, and frontal angles, (f) muscle weight, (g) muscle volume, (h) muscle cross-sectional area, and (i) and bending moment. Data on more than 12,000 morphometric or anatomical parameters were collected. Correlation values between bone variables, muscle variables, and in-between muscle variables were computed. Based on their compliance, muscles were classified using the ratio of belly length over the sum of intra-muscular and free tendons.
resultsValues of the neck, shaft, and total femur lengths were highly correlated in relation to each other. The long muscles and the pelvitrochanteric muscles were highly correlated with femoral bone lengths. The proximal and distal intra-muscular tendon lengths were correlated to the total muscle length for all long muscles, independently of free tendon (extra-muscular) or muscle belly lengths. A very significant correlation was found between muscle weight variations among specimens. Three groups of muscles were identified based on their compliance.
conclusionThis is the first comprehensive anatomical morphometric study which includes all the 24 muscles acting on the hip joint. It generates a unique anatomical dataset comprising all necessary data for musculoskeletal modeling and arthroplasty implants of the hip joint. A new muscle classification was proposed based on compliance where muscles of the same group would exhibit similar compliance and functional anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32734344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.