Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734330›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Tibial tray cementation is not necessary for knee revision with titanium metaphyseal sleeves: a mid-term prospective study in AORI 2B defects.

L J Floría-Arnal, A Gómez-Blasco, A Roche-Albero, J J Panisello-Sebastia, A Martin-Martinez, C Martin-Hernández

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L J Floría-ArnalDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain. luisjavierfloriaarnal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-9584
A Gómez-BlascoDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
A Roche-AlberoDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
J J Panisello-SebastiaDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
A Martin-MartinezDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
C Martin-HernándezDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetaphyseal fixation with porous titanium sleeves in revision knee surgery provides mechanical support to the implant, promotes biological fixation, and has shown satisfactory short- and mid-term results. Cement is commonly used to fix the tibial tray to the epiphyseal area. The objective of this study is to determine whether cement should be used to achieve fixation of the tibial tray with the hypothesis that metaphyseal sleeves would provide enough axial and rotational stability making cementation unnecessary. MATERIAL AND

methodsProspective study of 60 patients undergoing knee replacement surgery with metaphyseal sleeves in type 2B defects in femur and tibia. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of cement on the tibial component. Analysis included the American Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and functional scales, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index, the Short Form 12 (SF-12) health survey, and radiographic assessment with a maximum follow-up of 5 years.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in any of the parameters assessed.

conclusionMetaphyseal sleeves showed a 100% survivorship at five years of followup. There were no differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes at five years of follow-up depending on whether or not cement was used for tibial platform fixation. Cementation of the tibial tray would therefore not be required to achieve satisfactory mid-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II: prospective cohort study. Therapeutic.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisTitaniumCementationHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignReoperationTibiaTitaniumCementlessKnee replacementMetaphyseal fixationMetaphyseal sleevesRevision knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32734330
OpenAlexW3046744919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.