ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020
Suction-fixing surgical device for assisting liver manipulation with laparoscopic forceps.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNoninvasiveness and stability are significant issues in laparoscopic liver resection. Inappropriate grasping force can cause damage or serious bleeding to the liver. In addition, instability of grasping can result unsafe operations or wavered cutting. We propose a surgical device to improve stability of liver manipulation.
methodsA proposed device adheres to the liver surface with suction fixation, then tunes its stiffness to being hard and shapes like as a bulge on the liver surface to be grasped with laparoscopic forceps. It consists of two soft beams, a chamber sponge, membrane covering the device upper, suburb extrusion wing membrane, a vacuuming tube and to-be-grasped bars. The beams are designed as being non-stretchable and easy to bend. The device is connected to a medical vacuuming pump to vacuum air in the device and then gets hard to transfer forceps operation well. This stiffness tuning mechanism by pneumatic control features the device for achieving good liver shape followability and forceps operation propagation less invasively. The proposed device was tested with rubber phantoms and porcine livers on shape followability, stiffness transition, liver invasiveness and operational usability in the experiments.
resultsPerformance of the proposed device was assessed in experiments. The device showed good object-shape followability. It held the liver with 2.43-N force for vertical lifting and 4.90-N shear force with - 80 kPa vacuuming pressure. Invasiveness was reduced to acceptable level of liver damage. In usability test, the device grasped the liver stably and transferred surgical forceps operations to the liver surface well.
conclusionThe proposed device showed effective performance to improve laparoscopic liver manipulation. It held the liver stably and less invasively and transferred forceps operation force to the liver surface well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.