Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734235›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Health-Related Quality of Life in Home Dialysis Patients Compared to In-Center Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anna A Bonenkamp, Anita van Eck van der Sluijs, Tiny Hoekstra, Marianne C Verhaar, Frans J van Ittersum, Alferso C Abrahams, Brigit C van Jaarsveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for people with kidney failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of a Longitudinal Virtual Education Series on Home Dialysis Education: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. From Home to Wearable Hemodialysis: Barriers, Progress, and Opportunities.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Review
  18. The Burden of Home Dialysis: An Overlooked Challenge.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna A BonenkampDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anita van Eck van der SluijsDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Tiny HoekstraDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marianne C VerhaarDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frans J van IttersumDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alferso C AbrahamsDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Brigit C van JaarsveldDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveDialysis patients judge health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an essential outcome. Remarkably, little is known about HRQoL differences between home dialysis and in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients worldwide. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Search strategies were performed on the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases between 2007 and 2019. Home dialysis was defined as both peritoneal dialysis and home HD. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared HRQoL in home dialysis patients versus in-center HD patients. DATA EXTRACTION: The data extracted by 2 authors included HRQoL scores of different questionnaires, dialysis modality, and subcontinent. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Data were pooled using a random-effects model and results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses.

resultsForty-six articles reporting on 41 study populations were identified. Most studies were cross-sectional in design (90%), conducted on peritoneal dialysis patients (95%), and used the 12-item or 36-item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaires (83%). More than half the studies showed moderate or high risk of bias. Pooled analysis of 4,158 home dialysis patients and 7,854 in-center HD patients showed marginally better physical HRQoL scores in home dialysis patients compared with in-center HD patients (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.24), although heterogeneity was high ( LIMITATIONS: No randomized controlled trials were found and high heterogeneity among studies existed.

conclusionsAlthough pooled data showed marginally better physical HRQoL for home dialysis patients, the quality of design of the included studies was poor. Large prospective studies with adequate adjustments for confounders are necessary to establish whether home dialysis results in better HRQoL.

trial registrationPROSPERO 95985.

Indexed as

Home dialysishome hemodialysisin-center hemodialysismeta-analysisperitoneal dialysisquality of lifesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32734235
PMCPMC7380444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.