Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734214›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Patients' Experiences of Community House Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.

Rachael C Walker, David Tipene-Leach, Aria Graham, Suetonia C Palmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Research on Barriers and Facilitators to Home Hemodialysis.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Addressing Housing Issues Among People With Kidney Disease: Importance, Challenges, and Recommendations.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael C WalkerEastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.
David Tipene-LeachEastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.
Aria GrahamWhakauae Research Services, Whanganui, New Zealand.
Suetonia C PalmerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Eastern Institute of Technology · NZCanterbury District Health Board · NZWhakauae Research (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveCommunity house hemodialysis is a submodality of home hemodialysis that enables patients to perform hemodialysis independent of nursing or medical supervision in a shared house. This study describes the perspectives and experiences of patients using community house hemodialysis in New Zealand to explore ways this dialysis modality may support the wider delivery of independent hemodialysis care. STUDY

designQualitative semi-structured in-depth interview study. SETTING &

participants25 patients who had experienced community house hemodialysis. Participants were asked about why they chose community house hemodialysis and their experiences and perspectives of this. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Thematic analysis using an inductive approach.

results25 patients were interviewed (14 men and 11 women, aged 31-65 years). Most were of Māori or Pacific ethnicity and in part- or full-time employment. More than two-thirds dialyzed for 20 hours a week or more. We identified 4 themes that described patients' experiences and perspectives of choosing and using community house hemodialysis: reducing burden on family (when home is not an option, minimizing family exposure to dialysis, maintaining privacy and self-identity, reducing the costs of home hemodialysis, and gaining a reprieve from home), offering flexibility and freedom (having a normal life, maintaining employment, and facilitating travel), control of my health (building independence and self-efficacy, a place of wellness, avoiding institutionalization, and creating a culture of extended-hour dialysis), and community support (building social inclusion and supporting peers). LIMITATIONS: Non-Māori and non-Pacific patient experiences of community house hemodialysis could not be explored.

conclusionsCommunity house hemodialysis is a dialysis modality that overcomes many of the socioeconomic barriers to home hemodialysis, is socially and culturally acceptable to Māori and Pacific people, and supports extended-hour hemodialysis and thereby promotes more equitable access to best practice services. It is therefore a significant addition to independent hemodialysis options available for patients.

Indexed as

decision-makingEnd-stage kidney diseasehome hemodialysispatient preferencesemi-structured interviews

Identifiers

PMID32734214
PMCPMC7380439
OpenAlexW2975049666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.