Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734206›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Rie Glerup, My Svensson, Jens D Jensen, Jeppe H Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of Clinical Approach and OutcomesInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rie GlerupDepartment of Nephrology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
My SvenssonDepartment of Renal Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jens D JensenDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jeppe H ChristensenDepartment of Nephrology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveArteriovenous fistulas are the preferred access type for hemodialysis. The buttonhole needling technique has become an alternative to stepladder or area puncture. However, an increased risk for infection has been described. The present study examined the risk for infectious complications with different needling techniques. STUDY

designProspective multicenter observational cohort study with 5 years of follow-up. SETTING &

participantsIn-center hemodialysis patients from 5 hemodialysis units in Denmark, dialyzed on a native arteriovenous fistula. 286 patients were included; 144 cannulated with the buttonhole technique. EXPOSURE: The buttonhole cannulation technique was compared to the stepladder or area puncture technique. OUTCOMES: Primary end points: event rates of access-related ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the HR of access-related

resultsLIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized observational design, prevalent hemodialysis patients.

conclusionsAccess-related

Indexed as

bacteremiabuttonholecannulationDialysisend-stage renal diseasehemodialysisinfectionrenal failureStaphylococcus aureusvascular access

Identifiers

PMID32734206
PMCPMC7380414
OpenAlexW2973076739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.