Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734191›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Development and Validation of Residual Kidney Function Estimating Equations in Dialysis Patients.

Dominik Steubl, Li Fan, Wieneke M Michels, Lesley A Inker, Hocine Tighiouart, Friedo W Dekker, Raymond T Krediet, Andrew L Simon, Meredith C Foster, Amy B Karger and 15 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.

Dominik SteublDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Li FanDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NHC Key Laboratory of Nephrology (Sun Yat-sen University), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nephrology, Guangzhou, China.
Wieneke M MichelsDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lesley A InkerDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Hocine TighiouartInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center.
Friedo W DekkerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Raymond T KredietDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Andrew L SimonDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Meredith C FosterDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Amy B KargerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
John H EckfeldtDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Hongyan LiDepartment of Nephrology, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Huadu.
Jiamin TangDepartment of Nephrology, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Huadu.
Yongcheng HeDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen.
Minyan XieDepartment of Nephrology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Panyu.
Fei XiongDepartment of Nephrology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital and Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan.
Hongbo LiDepartment of Nephrology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital and Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha.
Jing HuDepartment of Nephrology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha.
Yunhua LiaoDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Xudong YeDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Tariq ShafiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Wei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NHC Key Laboratory of Nephrology (Sun Yat-sen University), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nephrology, Guangzhou, China.
Xueqing YuDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NHC Key Laboratory of Nephrology (Sun Yat-sen University), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nephrology, Guangzhou, China.
Andrew S LeveyDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Tufts Medical Center · USWuhan No.1 Hospital · CNAcademic Medical Center · NLCentral South University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Minnesota · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNJohns Hopkins Medicine · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLPanyu District Central Hospital · CNShenzhen Second People's Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTechnical University of Munich · DETufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveMeasurement of residual kidney function is recommended for the adjustment of the dialysis prescription, but timed urine collections are difficult and prone to errors. Equations to calculate residual kidney function from serum concentrations of endogenous filtration markers and demographic parameters would simplify monitoring of residual kidney function. However, few equations to estimate residual kidney function using serum concentrations of small solutes and low-molecular-weight proteins have been developed and externally validated. STUDY

designStudy of diagnostic test accuracy. SETTING &

participants823 Chinese peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (development cohort) and 826 PD and hemodialysis patients from the Netherlands NECOSAD study (validation cohort). TESTS COMPARED: Equations to estimate residual kidney function (estimated clearance [eCl]) using serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, cystatin C, β OUTCOMES: Residual kidney function measured as urinary clearance (mCl) of urea nitrogen (mCl

resultsIn external validation, bias (difference between mCl and eCl) was within ± 1.0 unit for all equations. Accuracy (percent of differences within ± 2.0 units) was significantly better for eCl LIMITATIONS: Development cohort only consisted of PD patients, no gold-standard method for residual kidney function measurement.

conclusionsThese results confirm the validity and extend the generalizability of residual kidney function estimating equations from serum concentrations of low-molecular-weight proteins without urine collection.

Indexed as

creatininehemodialysislow-molecular-weight proteinsperitoneal dialysisResidual kidney function

Identifiers

PMID32734191
PMCPMC7380427
OpenAlexW2943867749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.