Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734190›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Social Networks of Self-care and Perceived Treatment Burden Among Patients on In-Center Hemodialysis.

Mi-Kyung Song, Sudeshna Paul, Laura Plantinga, Carrie Henry, Linda Turberville-Trujillo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Known-groups validity and responsiveness to change of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS vs. 2.0): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mi-Kyung SongCenter for Nursing Excellence in Palliative Care, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Sudeshna PaulNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Laura PlantingaDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Carrie HenryCenter for Nursing Excellence in Palliative Care, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Linda Turberville-TrujilloEmory Dialysis, Emory HealthCare, Atlanta, GA.
Emory University · USEmory Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDialysis patients manage not only the demand of dialysis but also other complex chronic conditions. These individuals may draw upon personal and social resources to cope with the demands of self-management and care coordination. This study was designed to describe social networks for self-management and care coordination among hemodialysis patients and explore the association between network characteristics and perceived treatment burden. STUDY

designA cross-sectional study using social network analysis. SETTING &

participants20 patients from an outpatient dialysis center. FACTORS: Social network characteristics (eg, size and connectivity) and perceived treatment burden. MEASUREMENTS/OUTCOMES: Participants completed a battery of questionnaires, including the Patient Experience With Treatment and Self-management Questionnaire (measuring perceived treatment burden) and a social network survey asking the respondent to name up to 5 people to whom he or she turned for help with self-care and care coordination tasks and their characteristics and relationships.

resultsParticipants were aged 53.4 years on average, half were women, and 18 were African Americans. On average, network size was 3.1 members, most of whom were women and family members. 7 patient networks included at least 1 health care provider. The clustering coefficient (the overall connection between members) was 0.54, suggesting that not all members within the patient's network were connected with each other. Multimorbidity was not associated with treatment burden domain scores, but greater network connectivity was associated with lower treatment-related financial burden ( LIMITATIONS: The small sample was racially homogeneous and precluded controlling for potential confounding factors.

conclusionsDialysis patients used networks of people to manage self-care and coordination tasks, but interconnectedness between members of individual patients' networks was limited, which might negatively affect their perceived treatment burden. The social context of dialysis patients could play an important role in their illness management and treatment burden and calls for future research.

Indexed as

care coordinationChronic illness managementdialysiskidney failuresocial network

Identifiers

PMID32734190
PMCPMC7380407
OpenAlexW2943941509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.