Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734184›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

CKD Awareness in the General Population: Performance of CKD-Specific Questions.

Delphine S Tuot, Karen K Wong, Alexandra Velasquez, Deidra C Crews, Alan B Zonderman, Michele K Evans, Neil R Powe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Addressing Unmet Needs in the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.International journal of general medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Delphine S TuotDivision of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco.
Karen K WongTouro University California College of Osteopathic Medicine, Vallejo, CA.
Alexandra VelasquezDivision of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco.
Deidra C CrewsDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Alan B ZondermanNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD.
Michele K EvansNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD.
Neil R PoweCenter for Vulnerable Populations at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco.
National Institute on Aging · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USTouro University California · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveData from patients in one delivery system have suggested that the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) awareness differs by how the question is asked. We examined the sensitivity and specificity of different CKD awareness questions among diverse community-dwelling adults who were not necessarily engaged in primary care to determine the generalizability of prior results. STUDY

designCross-sectional study. SETTING &

participantsParticipants in the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity Across the Life Span (HANDLS) Study. PREDICTOR: CKD awareness, ascertained using 5 different questions. OUTCOME: Sensitivity and specificity of each awareness question, using laboratory results as the gold standard. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Logistic regression was used to compare sensitivities of different awareness questions.

resultsAmong 2,046 participants, mean (SD) age was 56.5 (9.1) years, 41.5% were men, and 61.3% were African American. More than 40% were poor, 35% reported not having health insurance, and 16.9% had low health literacy. More than 20% (n = 424) had CKD. Sensitivities of single CKD awareness questions ranged from 2.2% for "kidney damage" to 5.2% for "kidney problem." Sensitivity of the compound question asking about "weak kidneys, failing kidneys, or kidney disease" was 19.5%. Sensitivity of this compound CKD awareness question was higher among study participants with more advanced CKD and low health literacy, and those who lived below the poverty level. LIMITATIONS: Single measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria; study participants may have been more engaged in their health care than the average US adult, potentially limiting the generalizability of results.

conclusionsCKD awareness is low among community-dwelling adults with kidney disease, though data using a sensitive compound question ascertaining awareness suggest that we have met the Healthy People 2020 goal related to CKD awareness of 13.4%. Understanding the phrases about kidney disease that are most understandable to patients with and at risk for CKD is important to further increase CKD awareness.

Indexed as

CKDCKD awarenessHANDLSknowledgeliteracysensitivity

Identifiers

PMID32734184
PMCPMC7380399
OpenAlexW2918066240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.