ArticleJAMIA open2020
Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study.
Article in JAMIA open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI-Based Sepsis Prediction in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review, Subgroup Meta-Analysis, and Contextual Analysis of Clinical Burden.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence for Sepsis Prediction in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Modeling for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2025Pooled it
- Revolutionizing sepsis diagnosis using machine learning and deep learning models: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Deployment of machine learning algorithms to predict sepsis: systematic review and application of the SALIENT clinical AI implementation framework.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- Utilizing Machine Learning for Diagnostic Assistance of Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock in Resource-Limited Settings.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Advanced artificial intelligence vs simpler models for 1-year death prediction among patients receiving hemodialysis.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- A clinical machine learning model for 1-year functional outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke: temporal validation across evolving guidelines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel, standardised approach to balancing effectiveness, efficiency and utility of surveillance AI prediction models for hospitalised patients using sepsis prediction as an exemplar.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Hospital-Wide Sepsis Detection: A Machine Learning Model Based on Prospectively Expert-Validated Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of deep learning models for real-time neural tissue segmentation in spinal endoscopy.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluating sepsis watch generalizability through multisite external validation of a sepsis machine learning model.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Intelligent Prediction Platform for Sepsis Risk Based on Real-Time Dynamic Temporal Features: Design Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Effective reduction of unnecessary biopsies through a deep-learning-assisted aggressive prostate cancer detector.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence based multispecialty mortality prediction models for septic shock in a multicenter retrospective study.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Automatic sequence identification in multicentric prostate multiparametric MRI datasets for clinical machine-learning.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- SepsisJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in sepsis in the Emergency Department: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDetermine if deep learning detects sepsis earlier and more accurately than other models. To evaluate model performance using implementation-oriented metrics that simulate clinical practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe trained internally and temporally validated a deep learning model (multi-output Gaussian process and recurrent neural network [MGP-RNN]) to detect sepsis using encounters from adult hospitalized patients at a large tertiary academic center. Sepsis was defined as the presence of 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, a blood culture order, and at least one element of end-organ failure. The training dataset included demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, medication administrations, and labs from October 1, 2014 to December 1, 2015, while the temporal validation dataset was from March 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018. Comparisons were made to 3 machine learning methods, random forest (RF), Cox regression (CR), and penalized logistic regression (PLR), and 3 clinical scores used to detect sepsis, SIRS, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Traditional discrimination statistics such as the C-statistic as well as metrics aligned with operational implementation were assessed.
resultsThe training set and internal validation included 42 979 encounters, while the temporal validation set included 39 786 encounters. The C-statistic for predicting sepsis within 4 h of onset was 0.88 for the MGP-RNN compared to 0.836 for RF, 0.849 for CR, 0.822 for PLR, 0.756 for SIRS, 0.619 for NEWS, and 0.481 for qSOFA. MGP-RNN detected sepsis a median of 5 h in advance. Temporal validation assessment continued to show the MGP-RNN outperform all 7 clinical risk score and machine learning comparisons.
conclusionsWe developed and validated a novel deep learning model to detect sepsis. Using our data elements and feature set, our modeling approach outperformed other machine learning methods and clinical scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.