Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734045›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2018

Inter-observer variability for cardiac ultrasound measurements in cats repeated at different time points in early adult life.

Ingrid van Hoek, Jessie Rose Payne, Alexandre Feugier, David J Connolly

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingrid van HoekRoyal Canin SAS. 650, Avenue de la petite Camargue, Aimargues 30470, France.
Jessie Rose PayneQueen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Alexandre FeugierRoyal Canin SAS. 650, Avenue de la petite Camargue, Aimargues 30470, France.
David J ConnollyQueen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high degree of accuracy is required when using echocardiography to diagnose hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in cats, as variation in measurements of 0.5 mm may affect classification of individuals as 'abnormal'. This study in adult cats examined at different time points inter-observer variability between two Board certified echocardiographers in veterinary cardiology. Twenty-four female European shorthair cats were examined at 12, 18 and 24 months of age by observer 1. Two dimensional (2D) echocardiographic images were collected in conscious cats to measure left ventricular, aortic and left atrial dimensions. Measurements were repeated by observer 2 on stored images, and analysed for effect of time, observer and time-observer interaction. Based on end-diastolic left ventricular wall thickness, cats were diagnosed as 'normal' or 'abnormal'. Linear mixed models (generalized when appropriate) were performed. A significant difference between observers was found for all septal (IVSd) and free wall (LVFWd) thickness measurements and left ventricular internal diameters but not for aortic or left atrial measurements. All measurement coefficients of variation (CV) were < 10%. The CV for IVSd was higher than the CV for LVFWd. There was a significant effect of time on IVSd, aortic measurements and left ventricular internal diameter measurements. No significant time-observer interaction was found for any parameter. Diagnosis of cats as 'abnormal' (>5 mm in cats > 6 kg bodyweight) was significantly different between observers for IVSd but not LVFWd. Caution is warranted when diagnosing as 'abnormal' or interpreting small changes based on IVSd, due to significant inter-observer differences in this measurement.

Indexed as

CatHeartReproducibilityUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32734045
PMCPMC7386641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.