Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733922›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Antimicrobials Used in Backyard and Commercial Poultry and Swine Farms in the Philippines: A Qualitative Pilot Study.

Toni Rose M Barroga, Reildrin G Morales, Carolyn C Benigno, Samuel Joseph M Castro, Mardi M Caniban, Maria Fe B Cabullo, Agnes Agunos, Katinka de Balogh, Alejandro Dorado-Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sustainability and future outlook of the Philippine pig industry.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial Resistance Profile ofActa medica Philippina · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quantification of antimicrobial use in Fijian livestock farms.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Toni Rose M BarrogaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-Philippine Component on the Global Efforts to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance Using One Health Approach (GCP/GLO/UK/710), Quezon City, Philippines.
Reildrin G MoralesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-Philippine Component on the Global Efforts to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance Using One Health Approach (GCP/GLO/UK/710), Quezon City, Philippines.
Carolyn C BenignoFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office of Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Samuel Joseph M CastroDepartment of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry, Quezon City, Philippines.
Mardi M CanibanDepartment of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry, Quezon City, Philippines.
Maria Fe B CabulloDepartment of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry, Quezon City, Philippines.
Agnes AgunosFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office of Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Katinka de BaloghFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office of Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alejandro Dorado-GarciaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chicken and pork are the most frequently consumed meat products in the Philippines. Swine and poultry are reared in either commercial farms (CMf) or backyard farms (BYf); the latter production system is relatively common and essential to food security in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as the Philippines. Similar to resource-limited LMICs, antimicrobial use (AMU) surveillance has not yet been established; thus, AMU in food animals is a knowledge gap in understanding the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in zoonotic foodborne bacteria in the country. This qualitative AMU pilot study aims to describe the antimicrobial active ingredients (AAIs) used and associated AMU practices (e.g., source of AAIs and informed AMU decisions) by poultry and swine CMf and BYf in the Philippines. Ninety-three farms across four regions in the Philippines voluntarily provided AMU information as part of a larger biosecurity and good practices study. The percentage of farms using AAI over the total number of farms was the metric used to describe AMU. In total, there were 30 AAIs used (CMf:

Indexed as

antimicrobialsfarm levelLMICPhilippinespoultrysurveillanceswine

Identifiers

PMID32733922
PMCPMC7360799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.