Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

An

Noriaki Nagai, Misa Minami, Saori Deguchi, Hiroko Otake, Hiroshi Sasaki, Naoki Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress of methylcellulose-based thermosensitive hydrogels applied in biomedical field].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noriaki NagaiFaculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Misa MinamiFaculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Saori DeguchiFaculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroko OtakeFaculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi SasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Naoki YamamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Kindai University · JPKanazawa Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously developed ophthalmic formulations containing tranilast nanopartaicles (ophthalmic TL-NPs formulations), and found them to show high uptake into ocular tissues. In this study, we aimed to design an

Indexed as

in situ gelling systemmethylcellulosenanoparticlesophthalmic deliverytranilast

Identifiers

PMID32733870
PMCPMC7358604
OpenAlexW3042157433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.