ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2020
Impact of Geriatric Nutritional Index in Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Developed in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of outcomes in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGeriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a useful tool to determine the nutritional status of patients. Any study has not evaluated the impact of GNRI in development of contrast- induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to evaluate whether GNRI could predict CIN after PCI.
methodA total of 1116 patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) that underwent PCI were enrolled to the present study. The GNRI was calculated using a previously reported formula: GNRI=14.89 × albumin (g/dL) + 41.7 × body weight (kg)/ideal body weight (kg). CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% above baseline within 72 hours after the PCI procedure. The patients were categorized into two groups as CIN (+) and CIN (-).
resultsThe mean age of the CIN (+) group was significantly higher than the CIN (-) group (64.8±10.67 vs. 60.5±10.61 years; p<0.001). The mean values of height, weight, and body mass index were significanlty lower in CIN (+) group than CIN (-) group (p<0.001, for all). The mean of GNRI was significantly lower in the CIN (+) group than the CIN (-) group (101.4±8.7 vs. 112.1±12.9; p<0.001). Serum albumin level was significantly lower in the CIN (+) group (3.71±0.52 g/dL vs. 3.94±0.53 g/dL; p<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower in the CIN (+) group (50.7%±9.07 vs. 54.3%±7.20; p<0.001).
conclusionIn this study, GNRI, serum albumin level, BMI, and LVEF were independent predictors of CIN. Moreover, GNRI was better than both serum albumin level and BMI in predicting development of CIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.