Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733461›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Innate Immune Defense Mechanisms by Myeloid Cells That Hamper Cancer Immunotherapy.

Els Lebegge, Sana M Arnouk, Pauline M R Bardet, Máté Kiss, Geert Raes, Jo A Van Ginderachter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Els LebeggeLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Sana M ArnoukLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Pauline M R BardetLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Máté KissLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Geert RaesLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jo A Van GinderachterLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, cancer immunotherapy has been steering immune responses toward cancer cell eradication. However, these immunotherapeutic approaches are hampered by the tumor-promoting nature of myeloid cells, including monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Despite the arsenal of defense strategies against foreign invaders, myeloid cells succumb to the instructions of an established tumor. Interestingly, the most primordial defense responses employed by myeloid cells against pathogens, such as complement activation, antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity and phagocytosis, actually seem to favor cancer progression. In this review, we discuss how rudimentary defense mechanisms deployed by myeloid cells can promote tumor progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateImmunotherapyMyeloid CellsNeoplasmsTumor EscapeTumor Microenvironmentcancer immunotherapyimmune suppressionimmunotherapy resistanceinnate immune responsetumor-associated myeloid cellstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32733461
PMCPMC7363805
OpenAlexW3042183053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.