Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2020

Inflammation and Corticospinal Functioning in Multiple Sclerosis: A TMS Perspective.

Mario Stampanoni Bassi, Fabio Buttari, Luana Gilio, Nicla De Paolis, Diego Fresegna, Diego Centonze, Ennio Iezzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mario Stampanoni BassiUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Fabio ButtariUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Luana GilioUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Nicla De PaolisUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Diego FresegnaLaboratory of Synaptic Immunopathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Diego CentonzeUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Ennio IezziUnit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been employed in multiple sclerosis (MS) to assess the integrity of the corticospinal tract and the corpus callosum and to explore some physiological properties of the motor cortex. Specific alterations of TMS measures have been strongly associated to different pathophysiological mechanisms, particularly to demyelination and neuronal loss. Moreover, TMS has contributed to investigate the neurophysiological basis of MS symptoms, particularly those not completely explained by conventional structural damage, such as fatigue. However, variability existing between studies suggests that alternative mechanisms should be involved. Knowledge of MS pathophysiology has been enriched by experimental studies in animal models (i.e., experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis) demonstrating that inflammation alters synaptic transmission, promoting hyperexcitability and neuronal damage. Accordingly, TMS studies have demonstrated an imbalance between cortical excitation and inhibition in MS. In particular, cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of different proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules have been associated to corticospinal hyperexcitability, highlighting that inflammatory synaptopathy may represent a key pathophysiological mechanism in MS. In this perspective article, we discuss whether corticospinal excitability alterations assessed with TMS in MS patients could be useful to explain the pathophysiological correlates and their relationships with specific MS clinical characteristics and symptoms. Furthermore, we discuss evidence indicating that, in MS patients, inflammatory synaptopathy could be present since the early phases, could specifically characterize relapses, and could progressively increase during the disease course.

Indexed as

cytokinesinflammationmultiple sclerosis (MS)synaptic transmissionTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID32733354
PMCPMC7358546
OpenAlexW3041427520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.