SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2020
What Do We Know About Young Adult Cardiac Patients' Experience? A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation on Anxiety in Heart Failure Patients: The TELEREH-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024Trial
- Predictors of health-related quality-of-life after cardiac surgery: findings from the ANesthesiology-QUality-Registry (ANQUR) and frailty-management.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Unmet health-related needs of heritable arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy carriers in Belgium: The UR-HEART survey study.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Quality of life and mental health of women who had cardiac disease in pregnancy and postpartum.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- The development and validation of scales to measure the presence of a teachable moment following a cardiovascular disease event.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in German Speaking Countries of Europe-Evidence-Based Guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH-Part 2.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease in Lithuania.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.