Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733288›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Prevalence of Novel Psychoactive Substance (NPS) Use in Patients Admitted to Drug Detoxification Treatment.

Michael Specka, Thomas Kuhlmann, Jürgen Sawazki, Udo Bonnet, Renate Steinert, Monika Cybulska-Rycicki, Helmut Eich, Benita Zeiske, Antje Niedersteberg, Luzia Schaaf and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Knowledge and Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances in an Italian Sample with Substance Use Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SpeckaLVR Hospital Essen Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas KuhlmannPsychosomatische Klinik Bergisch Gladbach, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Jürgen SawazkiLVR Clinic Viersen, Viersen, Germany.
Udo BonnetCastrop-Rauxel Evangelical Hospital, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
Renate SteinertLWL-Klinik Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Monika Cybulska-RycickiLVR Clinic Langenfeld, Langenfeld, Germany.
Helmut EichClinic Maria Hilf GmbH, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Benita ZeiskeAlexius/Josef Hospital, Neuss, Germany.
Antje NiederstebergLVR Clinic Düren, Düren, Germany.
Luzia SchaafLVR Clinic Viersen, Viersen, Germany.
Norbert ScherbaumLVR Hospital Essen Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
LVR-Klinik für Orthopädie Viersen · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEAsklepios Klinik Langen · DEFederal Highway and Transport Research Institute · DEKliniken Maria Hilf · DEKrankenhaus Düren · DELandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe · DERütgers (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 15 years ago, a diverse group of new recreational psychotropic substances began to emerge, which were marketed for example as "legal highs," "research chemicals," or "designer drugs." These substances were later subsumed under the label "Novel Psychoactive Substances" (NPS). Important NPS classes are cathinones, synthetic cannabimimetics, phenethylamines, and herbal drugs. The health care system for psychotropic substance use disorders (SUDs) traditionally focused on a few substances, such as alcohol, heroin, cocaine, amphetamines, or cannabis. Users of illicit substances often engage in polydrug use. However little is known about the prevalence of NPS use within the group of "classical" illicit substance users.

objectiveWe investigated lifetime and recent use of NPS and other drugs in patients who underwent in-patient detoxification treatment from illicit drugs in Germany.

methodsIn a multicenter study with eight participating facilities, patients admitted to treatment underwent a standardized interview at admission, concerning their past and current substance use. The interview comprised classical substances of abuse, NPS, and rarely used substances such as LSD. In addition, participating sites had the opportunity to analyze their patients' routine drug screenings by means of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), which permitted detection of NPS.

resultsInterviews from 295 patients could be analyzed. Most patients were opiate dependent and multiple substance users. About 32% reported use of synthetic cannabimimetics during lifetime, but usually only a few times. An important reason for their use was that NPS were not detected by drug testing in prisons or drug treatment facilities. Cathinones, herbal drugs or other NPS had rarely been used during lifetime. NPS use during the last 30 days before admission was nearly zero. This was confirmed by urine analysis results. In contrast, lifetime and current use of opiates, alcohol, cocaine, benzodiazepines, and cannabis was high. In addition, 18% reported of regular unprescribed pregabalin use during lifetime, and 20% had recently used pregabalin.

conclusionPatients admitted to drug detoxification treatment showed multiple substance use, but this did not include NPS use. The diversion of legal medications such as pregabalin in this group is a serious concern.

Indexed as

drug dependencedrug detoxificationmultiple substance usenovel psychoactive substancesopiate dependentspregabalin abuse

Identifiers

PMID32733288
PMCPMC7358402
OpenAlexW3042112718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.