Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2020

Experimental and Computational Study on Motor Control and Recovery After Stroke: Toward a Constructive Loop Between Experimental and Virtual Embodied Neuroscience.

Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro, Egidio Falotico, Spase Petkoski, Maria Pasquini, Lorenzo Vannucci, Núria Tort-Colet, Emilia Conti, Francesco Resta, Cristina Spalletti, Shravan Tata Ramalingasetty and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Brain architecture-based vulnerability to traumatic injury.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Anna Letizia Allegra MascaroNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Egidio FaloticoDepartment of Excellence in Robotics & AI, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Spase PetkoskiAix-Marseille Université, Inserm, INS UMR_S 1106, Marseille, France.
Maria PasquiniDepartment of Excellence in Robotics & AI, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Lorenzo VannucciDepartment of Excellence in Robotics & AI, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Núria Tort-ColetParis-Saclay University, Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Emilia ContiEuropean Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Francesco RestaEuropean Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Cristina SpallettiNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Shravan Tata RamalingasettyBiorobotics Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Axel von ArnimFortiss GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Emanuele FormentoBertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational NeuroEngineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emmanouil AngelidisFortiss GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Camilla H BlixhavnInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Trygve B LeergaardInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Matteo CaleoNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Alain DestexheParis-Saclay University, Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Auke IjspeertBiorobotics Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silvestro MiceraDepartment of Excellence in Robotics & AI, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Cecilia LaschiDepartment of Excellence in Robotics & AI, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Viktor JirsaAix-Marseille Université, Inserm, INS UMR_S 1106, Marseille, France.
Marc-Oliver GewaltigBlue Brain Project (BBP), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Francesco S PavoneEuropean Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Florence · ITFortiss · DEInserm · FRUniversity of Oslo · NOCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being able to replicate real experiments with computational simulations is a unique opportunity to refine and validate models with experimental data and redesign the experiments based on simulations. However, since it is technically demanding to model all components of an experiment, traditional approaches to modeling reduce the experimental setups as much as possible. In this study, our goal is to replicate all the relevant features of an experiment on motor control and motor rehabilitation after stroke. To this aim, we propose an approach that allows continuous integration of new experimental data into a computational modeling framework. First, results show that we could reproduce experimental object displacement with high accuracy via the simulated embodiment in the virtual world by feeding a spinal cord model with experimental registration of the cortical activity. Second, by using computational models of multiple granularities, our preliminary results show the possibility of simulating several features of the brain after stroke, from the local alteration in neuronal activity to long-range connectivity remodeling. Finally, strategies are proposed to merge the two pipelines. We further suggest that additional models could be integrated into the framework thanks to the versatility of the proposed approach, thus allowing many researchers to achieve continuously improved experimental design.

Indexed as

brain network modelsclosed-loop simulationKuramoto oscillatorsmotor controlneural massrehabilitationspiking neuronal networksstroke

Identifiers

PMID32733210
PMCPMC7359878
OpenAlexW3041088861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.