Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32733153›Full record

ArticleThe journal of poultry science2020

Effect of

Saman Alam, Saima Masood, Hafsa Zaneb, Imtiaz Rabbani, Rifat Ullah Khan, Muqader Shah, Saima Ashraf, Ibrahim A Alhidary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Perspective, Opportunities and Challenges in Using Fennel (Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Potential Applications ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Saman AlamDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Bio Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Saima MasoodDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Bio Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Hafsa ZanebDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Bio Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Imtiaz RabbaniDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Bio Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Rifat Ullah KhanDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Muqader ShahDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Saima AshrafDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Bio Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Ibrahim A AlhidaryDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PKAnimal Husbandry & Veterinary · INKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a 28-day trial to evaluate the influence of

Indexed as

intestinal morphometryJapanese quailpectoralis musclephytaseprobiotictibia bone

Identifiers

PMID32733153
PMCPMC7387942
OpenAlexW2991484937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.