Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32732945›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus) adapt their interspecific gestural communication to the recipient's behaviour.

Juliette Aychet, Pablo Pezzino, Arnaud Rossard, Philippe Bec, Catherine Blois-Heulin, Alban Lemasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juliette AychetUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, 35000, Rennes, France. juliette.aychet@univ-rennes1.fr.
Pablo PezzinoUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, 35000, Rennes, France.
Arnaud RossardUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, 35000, Rennes, France.
Philippe BecUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, 35000, Rennes, France.
Catherine Blois-HeulinUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, 35000, Rennes, France.
Alban LemassonUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, 35000, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitivity to recipient's attention and responsiveness are critical markers of intentional communication. Although previous research showed that ape gestures can be intentional, few studies have yet addressed this question concerning monkeys. Here, we characterise the effect of a recipient's presence, attentional state and responsiveness on the interspecific gestural communication of captive red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus). Previous reports showed that they produced learnt begging gestures towards a human recipient preferentially when the latter was facing them. We used here a novel setup that allows subjects to move around an experimenter and to use different modalities (visual and acoustic) to communicate. We found that when the recipient was not facing them, mangabeys moved to a position in the visual field of their recipient rather than using attention-getters. Interestingly, unlike apes, they did not elaborate their communication visually or acoustically when the experimenter did not respond favourably to their begging. However, our results may suggest that begging gestures were goal-directed, since mangabeys inhibited them when the experimenter was not available to answer immediately (i.e. give a reward). Overall, red-capped mangabeys' interspecific visual communication presented intentionality features, but their use of begging gestures was less flexible than that of great apes in similar situations.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationBehavior, AnimalGesturesAnimalsAttentionCercocebusFemaleHumansIntentionMaleVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID32732945
PMCPMC7393380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.