Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32732930›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2020

Capnovolumetry in combination with clinical history for the diagnosis of asthma and COPD.

C Kellerer, K Klütsch, K Husemann, S Sorichter, R A Jörres, A Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development and preliminary tests of a portable volumetric capnograph for outpatient use.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C KellererTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Munich, Germany. christina.kellerer@mri.tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0670-6392
K KlütschInstitute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
K HusemannMedizinisches Versorgungszentrum MVZ Klinikum, Kempten, Germany.
S SorichterRKK-Klinikum, St. Josefskrankenhaus, Freiburg, Germany.
R A JörresInstitute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
A SchneiderTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DEKempten University of Applied Sciences · DERegionalverbund kirchlicher Krankenhäuser · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capnovolumetry performed during resting ventilation is an easily applicable diagnostic tool sensitive to airway obstruction. In the present analysis, we investigated in which way capnovolumetric parameters can be combined with basic anamnestic information to support the diagnosis of asthma and COPD. Among 1400 patients of a previous diagnostic study, we selected 1057 patients with a diagnosis of asthma (n = 433), COPD (n = 260), or without respiratory disease (n = 364). Besides performing capnovolumetry, patients answered questions on symptoms and smoking status. Logistic regression analysis, single decision trees (CHAID), and ensembles of trees (random forest) were used to identify diagnostic patterns of asthma and COPD. In the random forest approach, area/volume of phase 3, dyspnea upon strong exertion, s3/s2, and current smoking were identified as relevant parameters for COPD vs control. For asthma vs control, they were wheezing, volume of phase 2, current smoking, and dyspnea at strong exertion. For COPD vs asthma, s3/s2 was the primary criterion, followed by current smoking and smoking history. These parameters were also identified as relevant in single decision trees. Regarding the diagnosis of asthma vs control, COPD vs control, and COPD vs asthma, the area under the curve was 0.623, 0.875, and 0.880, respectively, in the random forest approach. Our results indicate that for the diagnosis of asthma and COPD capnovolumetry can be combined with basic anamnestic information in a simple, intuitive, and efficient manner. As capnovolumetry requires less cooperation from the patient than spirometry, this approach might be helpful for clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsthmaBreath TestsCarbon DioxideDecision TreesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedical History TakingMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Function TestsCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID32732930
PMCPMC7393160
OpenAlexW3046173340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.