Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32732434›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Differences in the free energies between the excited states of A

Debayan Chakraborty, John E Straub, D Thirumalai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Sizes, conformational fluctuations, and SAXS profiles for intrinsically disordered proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Odd-even disparity in the population of slipped hairpins in RNA repeat sequences with implications for phase separation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debayan ChakrabortyDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0003-4339-5818
John E StraubDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-3316
D ThirumalaiDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; dave.thirumalai@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1801-5924

Funding

Computational Approaches to Single Molecule Force SpectroscopyR01GM089685 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI THIRUMALAI, DEVARAJAN · 2010 to 2020
$2.9M
Probing the roles of membrane and cholesterol on Aβ biogenesis and prion protein interactionsR01GM107703 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI STRAUB, JOHN E., THIRUMALAI, DEVARAJAN · 2015 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089685NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early events in the aggregation of the intrinsically disordered peptide, amyloid-β (Aβ), involve transitions from the disordered free energy ground state to assembly-competent states. Are the fingerprints of order found in the amyloid fibrils encoded in the conformations that the monomers access at equilibrium? If so, could the enhanced aggregation rate of Aβ42 compared to Aβ40 be rationalized from the sparsely populated high free energy states of the monomers? Here, we answer these questions in the affirmative using coarse-grained simulations of the self-organized polymer-intrinsically disordered protein (SOP-IDP) model of Aβ40 and Aβ42. Although both the peptides have practically identical ensemble-averaged properties, characteristic of random coils (RCs), the conformational ensembles of the two monomers exhibit sequence-specific heterogeneity. Hierarchical clustering of conformations reveals that both the peptides populate high free energy aggregation-prone ([Formula: see text]) states, which resemble the monomers in the fibril structure. The free energy gap between the ground (RC) and the [Formula: see text] states of Aβ42 peptide is smaller than that for Aβ40. By relating the populations of excited states of the two peptides to the fibril formation time scales using an empirical formula, we explain nearly quantitatively the faster aggregation rate of Aβ42 relative to Aβ40. The [Formula: see text] concept accounts for fibril polymorphs, leading to the prediction that the less stable [Formula: see text] state of Aβ42, encoding for the U-bend fibril, should form earlier than the structure with the S-bend topology, which is in accord with Ostwald's rule rationalizing crystal polymorph formation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesEntropyHumansPeptide FragmentsProtein AggregatesAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)amyloid beta-protein (1-42)Peptide FragmentsProtein AggregatesAlzheimer’s diseasefree energy gapOstwald’s rulepolymorphismprotein aggregation

Identifiers

PMID32732434
PMCPMC7443889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.