Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32732322›Full record

Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020

Practice composition and sex differences in physician income: observational study.

Christopher M Whaley, Daniel R Arnold, Nate Gross, Anupam B Jena

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association Between Specialty-Specific Physician Salaries and Percentage of Women in the Workforce.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Women are underrepresented in major US sleep societies recognition awards.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher M WhaleyRand, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Daniel R ArnoldDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nate GrossDoximity, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anupam B JenaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA jena@hcp.med.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9734-5122

Funding

The Effects of Insurance Benefit Design Innovation on Patient HealthK01AG061274 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI WHALEY, CHRISTOPHER · 2019 to 2023
$649k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG061274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether differences in income between male and female physicians vary according to the sex composition of physician practices.

designRetrospective observational study.

settingUS national survey of physician salaries, 2014-18.

participants18 802 physicians from 9848 group practices (categorized according to proportion of male physicians ≤50%, >50-75%, >75-90%, and >90%).

main outcome measuresSex differences in physician income in relation to the sex composition of physician practices after multivariable adjustment for physician specialty, years of experience, hours worked, measures of clinical workload, practice type, and geography.

resultsAmong 11 490 non-surgical specialists, the absolute adjusted sex difference in annual income (men versus women) was $36 604 (£29 663; €32 621) (95% confidence interval $24 903 to $48 306; 11.7% relative difference) for practices with 50% or less of male physicians compared with $91 669 ($56 587 to $126 571; 19.9% relative difference) for practices with at least 90% of male physicians (P=0.03 for difference). Similar findings were observed among surgical specialists (n=3483), with absolute adjusted sex difference in annual income of $46 503 ($42 198 to $135 205; 10.2% relative difference) for practices with 50% or less of male physicians compared with $149 460 ($86 040 to $212 880; 26.9% relative difference) for practices with at least 90% of male physicians (P=0.06 for difference). Among primary care physicians (n=3829), sex differences in income were not related to the proportion of male physicians in a practice.

conclusionsAmong both non-surgical and surgical specialists, sex differences in income were largest in practices with the highest proportion of male physicians, even after detailed adjustment for factors that might explain sex differences in income.

Indexed as

FemaleGroup PracticeHumansIncomeMalePhysiciansPhysicians, WomenPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSex DistributionSurgeonsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32732322
PMCPMC7391074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.