Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32732276›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Y W Lui, P D Chang, G Zaharchuk, D P Barboriak, A E Flanders, M Wintermark, C P Hess, C G Filippi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Revolutionizing pediatric neuroimaging: the era of CT, MRI, and beyond.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Y W LuiFrom the Department of Radiology (Y.W.L.), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9984-9164
P D ChangDepartment of Radiology (P.D.C.), University of California Irvine Health Medical Center, Orange, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-7865
G ZaharchukDepartment of Neuroradiology (G.Z., M.W.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-8848
D P BarboriakDepartment of Radiology (D.P.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-6266
A E FlandersDepartment of Radiology (A.E.F.), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-0787
M WintermarkDepartment of Neuroradiology (G.Z., M.W.), Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-3951
C P HessDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.P.H.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5132-5302
C G FilippiDepartment of Radiology (C.G.F.), Northwell Health, New York, New York. sairaallapeikko@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4565-2614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fueled by new techniques, computational tools, and broader availability of imaging data, artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the practice of neuroradiology. The recent exponential increase in publications related to artificial intelligence and the central focus on artificial intelligence at recent professional and scientific radiology meetings underscores the importance. There is growing momentum behind leveraging artificial intelligence techniques to improve workflow and diagnosis and treatment and to enhance the value of quantitative imaging techniques. This article explores the reasons why neuroradiologists should care about the investments in new artificial intelligence applications, highlights current activities and the roles neuroradiologists are playing, and renders a few predictions regarding the near future of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHumansNeurologyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID32732276
PMCPMC7658873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.