Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32731886›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2020

Assessing what matters most to patients with or at risk for Alzheimer's and care partners: a qualitative study evaluating symptoms, impacts, and outcomes.

Dana B DiBenedetti, Christina Slota, Samantha L Wronski, George Vradenburg, Meryl Comer, Leigh F Callahan, John Winfield, Ivana Rubino, Holly B Krasa, Ann Hartry and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Further data to address the Alzheimer's coverage with evidence development questions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Priorities of people living with Alzheimer's and care partners: What Matters Most?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Appropriate use of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Dana B DiBenedettiRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. ddibenedetti@rti.org.
Christina SlotaRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Samantha L WronskiRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
George VradenburgUsAgainstAlzheimer's, Washington, DC, USA.
Meryl ComerUsAgainstAlzheimer's, Washington, DC, USA.
Leigh F CallahanUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
John WinfieldUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ivana RubinoBiogen, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Holly B KrasaBlue Persimmon Group LLC, Washington, DC, USA.
Ann HartryLundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Dan WiebergHome Instead, Inc., Omaha, NE, USA.
Ian N KremerLEAD Coalition (Leaders Engaged on Alzheimer's Disease), Washington, DC, USA.
Debra LappinFaegre Baker Daniels Consulting, Washington, DC, USA.
Allison D MartinFaegre Baker Daniels Consulting, Washington, DC, USA.
Terry FrangiosaUsAgainstAlzheimer's, Washington, DC, USA.
Virginia BiggarUsAgainstAlzheimer's, Washington, DC, USA.
Brett HauberRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
RTI Health Solutions · USUsAgainstAlzheimer · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBiogen (United States) · USBlue Pencil Group (United States) · USDeerfield (United States) · USQuality Living · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe What Matters Most (WMM) study was initiated to evaluate symptoms, AD-related impacts, treatment-related needs, preferences, and priorities among individuals with or at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their care partners. The objective of this qualitative study phase was to identify a comprehensive set of concepts of interest that are meaningful to individuals across the AD continuum.

methodsInterviews were conducted with 60 clinically referred individuals and care partners across 5 AD stages (n = 12 each): group 1 (non-clinically impaired individuals with AD pathology), group 2 (individuals with mild cognitive impairment and AD pathology), group 3 (individuals with mild AD), group 4 (individuals with moderate AD and their care partners), and group 5 (care partners of individuals with severe AD). Interviews were conducted by experienced interviewers, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Dominant trends were identified in each interview and compared across subsequent interviews to generate themes or patterns in descriptions of AD symptoms, impacts, and desired treatment outcomes.

resultsAll participants endorsed current issues related to memory; nearly all participants (n = 55; 92%) across the five groups endorsed symptoms related to communication and language. Groups 1-3 reported an impact on mood/emotions (n = 23; 64%) and a decrease in social activities or outgoingness (n = 17; 47%). Current and future concerns reported by the overall sample included memory (n = 48; 80%), dependence (n = 40; 67%), and "other" concerns (n = 33; 55.0%) (e.g., uncertainty about the future, burdening others). The most desired AD treatment outcomes were improvement or restoration of memory (n = 40; 67%) and stopping AD progression (n = 35; 58.3%). Group-level differences were observed in the symptoms, impacts, and desired treatment outcomes among patients and care partners across the AD continuum.

conclusionsCognitive functioning issues-particularly in memory and communication-are present even in preclinical and early-stage AD, including among those without a formal AD diagnosis. While the impacts of AD vary across the disease-severity spectrum, improved memory and disease modification were treatment outcomes considered most important to participants across all 5 AD stages. Neuropsychological assessments traditionally used in AD clinical trials may not evaluate the often-subtle concepts that are important to patients and care partners. Results from this study will inform the second phase of the WMM project-a quantitative study to elicit the relative importance of these concepts of interest to people at risk for and living with AD and their care partners.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionCaregiversHumansMemoryNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseaseCaregiverOutcomePatientQualitative

Identifiers

PMID32731886
PMCPMC7393916
OpenAlexW3045853079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.