ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2020
Assessing what matters most to patients with or at risk for Alzheimer's and care partners: a qualitative study evaluating symptoms, impacts, and outcomes.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Meaningfulness of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: Data From the Randomized Phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Trial.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Trial
- Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease: results from the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 long-term extension.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of cognitive, functional, and behavioral effects observed in EMERGE, a phase 3 trial of aducanumab in people with early Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Further data to address the Alzheimer's coverage with evidence development questions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Priorities of people living with Alzheimer's and care partners: What Matters Most?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
- Just Semantics? How Diagnostic Criteria Influence Physician-Patient Narratives in Alzheimer's Disease.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2026Article
- Target product profiles for treatments to delay or prevent symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- [Optimization of the work of outpatient memory clinics under aspects of value-based healthcare-An approach from the Center for Memory Disorders of the University Hospital Cologne].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences for Dementia Interventions: A Scoping Review With a Systematic Review of Medications and Choice-Based Methods.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Clinical meaningfulness of anti-amyloid therapies in early Alzheimer's disease: Perspectives from the East and Southeast Asia region.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- A scoping review and comprehensive needs assessment for developing an intergenerational cognitive and physical activity program for MCI patients and their adult children.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Experiences of patient and care partner dyads in early Alzheimer's disease: a mixed-method study in the United States.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025Article
- Making outcome measures matter: Why should "what matters to people living with dementia" matter to dementia researchers?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Qualitative research and literature review support the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) content validity in early symptomatic AD.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Review
- A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Appropriate use of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Family physicians' perspectives on outcomes, processes, and policies in dementia care.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Quality of life outcome measures in original studies of dementia interventions: policy and practice implications.The Public policy and aging report · 2025Review
- "What Matters" in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis of Older Adults' Concerns and Desired Outcomes.Medical care · 2024Observational
- Mobility-Based Smartphone Digital Phenotypes for Unobtrusively Capturing Everyday Cognition, Mood, and Community Life-Space in Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe What Matters Most (WMM) study was initiated to evaluate symptoms, AD-related impacts, treatment-related needs, preferences, and priorities among individuals with or at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their care partners. The objective of this qualitative study phase was to identify a comprehensive set of concepts of interest that are meaningful to individuals across the AD continuum.
methodsInterviews were conducted with 60 clinically referred individuals and care partners across 5 AD stages (n = 12 each): group 1 (non-clinically impaired individuals with AD pathology), group 2 (individuals with mild cognitive impairment and AD pathology), group 3 (individuals with mild AD), group 4 (individuals with moderate AD and their care partners), and group 5 (care partners of individuals with severe AD). Interviews were conducted by experienced interviewers, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Dominant trends were identified in each interview and compared across subsequent interviews to generate themes or patterns in descriptions of AD symptoms, impacts, and desired treatment outcomes.
resultsAll participants endorsed current issues related to memory; nearly all participants (n = 55; 92%) across the five groups endorsed symptoms related to communication and language. Groups 1-3 reported an impact on mood/emotions (n = 23; 64%) and a decrease in social activities or outgoingness (n = 17; 47%). Current and future concerns reported by the overall sample included memory (n = 48; 80%), dependence (n = 40; 67%), and "other" concerns (n = 33; 55.0%) (e.g., uncertainty about the future, burdening others). The most desired AD treatment outcomes were improvement or restoration of memory (n = 40; 67%) and stopping AD progression (n = 35; 58.3%). Group-level differences were observed in the symptoms, impacts, and desired treatment outcomes among patients and care partners across the AD continuum.
conclusionsCognitive functioning issues-particularly in memory and communication-are present even in preclinical and early-stage AD, including among those without a formal AD diagnosis. While the impacts of AD vary across the disease-severity spectrum, improved memory and disease modification were treatment outcomes considered most important to participants across all 5 AD stages. Neuropsychological assessments traditionally used in AD clinical trials may not evaluate the often-subtle concepts that are important to patients and care partners. Results from this study will inform the second phase of the WMM project-a quantitative study to elicit the relative importance of these concepts of interest to people at risk for and living with AD and their care partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.