Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32731878›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2020

Artificial neural networks improve early outcome prediction and risk classification in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to intensive care.

Jesper Johnsson, Ola Björnsson, Peder Andersson, Andreas Jakobsson, Tobias Cronberg, Gisela Lilja, Hans Friberg, Christian Hassager, Jesper Kjaergard, Matt Wise and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04974775 (Swecrit Biobank - Blood Samples From Critically Ill Patients and Healthy Controls), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04974775 active not recruitingnot on this map

Swecrit Biobank - Blood Samples From Critically Ill Patients and Healthy Controls

TypeobservationalSponsorSkane University HospitalRan2014 to 2026Enrolled8,500ConditionsCritical Illness, Cardiac Arrest, Sepsis, InfluenzaArmsBlood collection, Blood collection, serial sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jesper JohnssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden. jesper.johnsson@skane.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0651-3811
Ola BjörnssonCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Mathematical Statistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Peder AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Andreas JakobssonCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Mathematical Statistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tobias CronbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gisela LiljaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hans FribergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Christian HassagerDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper KjaergardDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matt WiseDepartment of Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Niklas NielsenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Attila FrigyesiCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Mathematical Statistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEStatistics Sweden · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

Lundbeckfonden R186-2015-2132Swedish Research Council 2015-04148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-hospital circumstances, cardiac arrest characteristics, comorbidities and clinical status on admission are strongly associated with outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Early prediction of outcome may inform prognosis, tailor therapy and help in interpreting the intervention effect in heterogenous clinical trials. This study aimed to create a model for early prediction of outcome by artificial neural networks (ANN) and use this model to investigate intervention effects on classes of illness severity in cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM).

methodsUsing the cohort of the TTM trial, we performed a post hoc analysis of 932 unconscious patients from 36 centres with OHCA of a presumed cardiac cause. The patient outcome was the functional outcome, including survival at 180 days follow-up using a dichotomised Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale with good functional outcome defined as CPC 1-2 and poor functional outcome defined as CPC 3-5. Outcome prediction and severity class assignment were performed using a supervised machine learning model based on ANN.

resultsThe outcome was predicted with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.891 using 54 clinical variables available on admission to hospital, categorised as background, pre-hospital and admission data. Corresponding models using background, pre-hospital or admission variables separately had inferior prediction performance. When comparing the ANN model with a logistic regression-based model on the same cohort, the ANN model performed significantly better (p = 0.029). A simplified ANN model showed promising performance with an AUC above 0.852 when using three variables only: age, time to ROSC and first monitored rhythm. The ANN-stratified analyses showed similar intervention effect of TTM to 33 °C or 36 °C in predefined classes with different risk of a poor outcome.

conclusionA supervised machine learning model using ANN predicted neurological recovery, including survival excellently, and outperformed a conventional model based on logistic regression. Among the data available at the time of hospitalisation, factors related to the pre-hospital setting carried most information. ANN may be used to stratify a heterogenous trial population in risk classes and help determine intervention effects across subgroups.

Indexed as

Critical CareHypothermia, InducedNeural Networks, ComputerAgedFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentROC CurveArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networksCerebral performance categoryCritical careIntensive careMachine learningOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPredictionPrognostication

Identifiers

PMID32731878
PMCPMC7394679
OpenAlexW3046182430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.