Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32731638›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Inflammatory Biomarkers and Breast Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of the Evidence and Future Potential for Intervention Research.

Rebecca D Kehm, Jasmine A McDonald, Suzanne E Fenton, Marion Kavanaugh-Lynch, Karling Alice Leung, Katherine E McKenzie, Jeanne S Mandelblatt, Mary Beth Terry

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of Fruit-Derived Antioxidants in Fighting Cancer: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. White Blood Cell Count, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Incident Cancer in the UK Biobank.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Linking Physical Activity to Breast Cancer via Inflammation, Part 2: The Effect of Inflammation on Breast Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca D KehmDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-6799
Jasmine A McDonaldDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8270-8074
Suzanne E FentonNational Toxicology Program Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, 111 TW Alexander Drive, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Marion Kavanaugh-LynchCalifornia Breast Cancer Research Program, University of California, 300 Lakeside Drive, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9568-5684
Karling Alice LeungSapientiae, 1977 Manzanita Dr, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.
Katherine E McKenzieCalifornia Breast Cancer Research Program, University of California, 300 Lakeside Drive, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8146-3570
Jeanne S MandelblattDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd. NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2490-005X
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · USGeorgetown University · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Mammary Gland as a Sensitive End Point to Effects of Endocrine DisruptorsZIAES102785 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FENTON, SUZANNE · 2010 to 2021
$38.1M
Bio-behavioral Research At The Intersection of Cancer and AgingR35CA197289 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2015 to 2021
$6.2M
Training Program in Cancer-related Population SciencesT32CA094061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I., TERRY, MARY BETH · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Childhood Infection and Pubertal TimingK01CA186943 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MCDONALD, JASMINE ALISE · 2015 to 2020
$751k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES102785NCI NIH HHS K01CA186943NCI NIH HHS R35CA197289NCI NIH HHS T32CA094061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring systemic chronic inflammatory markers in the blood may be one way of understanding the role of inflammation in breast cancer risk, and might provide an intermediate outcome marker in prevention studies. Here, we present the results of a systematic review of prospective epidemiologic studies that examined associations between systemic inflammatory biomarkers measured in blood and breast cancer risk. From 1 January 2014 to 20 April 2020, we identified 18 unique studies (from 16 publications) that examined the association of systemic inflammatory biomarkers measured in blood with breast cancer risk using prospectively collected epidemiologic data. Only one marker, C-reactive protein, was studied extensively (measured in 13 of the 16 publications), and had some evidence of a positive association with breast cancer risk. Evidence associating other inflammatory biomarkers and more comprehensive panels of markers with the development of breast cancer is limited. Future prospective evidence from expanded panels of systemic blood inflammatory biomarkers is needed to establish strong and independent links with breast cancer risk, along with mechanistic studies to understand inflammatory pathways and demonstrate how breast tissue responds to chronic inflammation. This knowledge could ultimately support the development and evaluation of mechanistically driven interventions to reduce inflammation and prevent breast cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInflammationProspective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive Proteinblood inflammatory biomarkersbreast cancer riskc-reactive proteinintervention researchprospective epidemiologic studiessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32731638
PMCPMC7432395
OpenAlexW3045876436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.